Joe Stanley Admits Role in Scandal

This just in…

Jim,

No one ever asked me if I forwarded the domain. If you had, I would have readily admitted it.

Open calls on the internet for an individual to identify themselves will go unheeded.

I didn’t realize Megan Rhodes was being pilloried for posting the link because I stopped reading Daily Whackjob when Greg B. called for the drowning of Greg Leticq’s child.

In our conversation the other day, you said politics was a “tough game” and recommended, “if you can’t handle that then you should get out.”

If you will recall, I told you then that you should make note of the date and time you said that to me. I am more than prepared for any fight the ODBA wants to have. Fortunately, our conversation turned a corner and before our call ended, I had redirected the domain to google.com.

I might add that I came to own the domain through perfectly legal means.

I pointed the domain to NAMBLA for specific reasons. NAMBLA is an organization that advocates a set of beliefs that turn my stomach. Through misinformation, prevarication, and a false sense of earnestness, they pursue a predatory agenda that brings direct harm to countless innocent individuals. Their primary defense is the first amendment.

It is my opinion that the ODBA conducts itself in much the same way. While the end product is far less repugnant than pedophilia, no fewer individuals are hurt by the organization. The main distinction I can make between the two organizations is that NAMBLA believes in the first amendment, and ODBA only believes in their right to free speech.

Nonetheless, I believe there are actually a few good people involved in the ODBA. Following our conversation the other day, I count you as one. I concur with Greg Leticq on quite a bit regarding illegal immigration. I also enjoy reading Elephant Ears, I’m Not Emeril, and From On High. I don’t always agree with them (read rarely) but I enjoy their insight.

As to our conversation the other day, I said nothing to you that I wouldn’t say to the world. I do not believe George Allen is racist because he used the word “macaca.” I do not believe that owning a Confederate flag makes you a racist, nor does an appearance in Gods and Generals. George Allen fumbled his way through the campaign looking for the politically expedient thing to do.

You have my full permission to reprint this email, in its entirety, on your blog or others.

If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. With great hope for the Commonwealth, I remain,

Sincerely yours,
Joe Stanley

Not good enough, Joe. Your “specific reasons” for forwarding the ODBA domain name to NAMBLA don’t matter. It was done with malice. You and Ben Tribbett obviously thought this was funny in some sort of juvenile way. Child sex abuse is NEVER funny.  Neither is defamation.

Take a good look at the man behind all this, Virginia…


Joe Stanley of Yellow Dog Strategy

35 Responses to “Joe Stanley Admits Role in Scandal”

  1. F-A-T

  2. Yeesh. I feel sorry for any boys that he has loved.

  3. That picture really does make me look fat.

  4. Sorry, Joe. That’s the only one I had.

  5. That was a joke, I am fat.

  6. Ah, I get it. I suppose we don’t have the same sense of humor. I don’t find pedophilia funny, either.

  7. P-H-A-T

  8. [...] UPDATE:  Joe admits to his role here. [...]

  9. How fat is Joe Stanley?

    Joe is soooo fat:

    the shadow of his ass weighs 80 lbs.
    naked, he looks like 300 lbs of chewed bubble-gum.
    if he were to walk down the street wearing a yellow raincoat, kids would jump on him, thinking he was a schools bus.
    when he walks through a crowd, he has smaller, fat people in orbit around him.
    if he were to hit the ground running, he would leave a crater.
    a siding company recently asked if he needed help fixing the hail-damage on his ass.
    Spaulding uses an imprint of his ass, to make golf balls.
    he has boobs on his back.
    hasn’t seen his winkie in years.

    they are drilling a new hole to find the crew lost in his navel.

  10. Good thing he’s drinking light beer, gotta maintain that figure.

  11. Does anyone know why Joey is no longer allowed on the premises of a certain church and day-care center in Roanoke?

  12. [...] 23, 2007 in DPVA, Virginia Senate, Ethics This one was blown wide open by Jim Riley over at Virginia Virtucon, but the results are going to forever cripple an already floundering Roscoe Reynolds [...]

  13. Does anyone know why Joey is no longer allowed on the premises of a certain church and day-care center in Roanoke?

    WOAH! Gimme more details!!!

  14. Easy now, NDJ. We don’t want to play their game of making false accusations and innuendos about people. Now, if you have proof of this, that is a different story.

  15. Curious - how old is this guy?

  16. That was a joke, I am fat.

    I was thinking of other words, words like –

    Corpulent. Porcine. Excessive. Bulbous. Monolithic. Superfluous. Assmaster. Fatty. Shamu-like. Big Boned. Obese.

    Not to metion a jewbaiter and a racist… You’re like a whole NAMBLA-tastic Klan of fat ass, Joe.

  17. Is it just me or does he remind anyone else of “Comic Book Guy” from “The Simpsons”?

    Does he live in his dad’s basement like Ben does?

    Want to place bets on whether he has “Spock-ears” in a drawer someplace and a Star Trek shirt that is 15 sizes too small?

  18. Look at his cellphone. If he lays on his back, it becomes a Satphone!

  19. And this is the guy Roscoe Reynolds (D) hired as his strategist? What does that say about Roscoe?

  20. According to Joe, the only thing he has done for Roscoe is put up his website for free. That and, well, putting out a hit on the ODBA by mocking victims of pedophiles.

  21. [...] Joe Stanley Admits Role in Scandal « Virginia Virtucon [...]

  22. Joe Stanley

    Sir, you are no gentleman. You need to really sit down and think about readjusting your moral compass before your own actions bring you to complete ruin. Riley over at Virginia Virtucon posts Joe-the-Jerk’s pseudo defense. Note this paragraph: If you …

  23. Aw, leave the poor guy alone, he may never see his twig and berries again.

  24. I say we all move on now……..

  25. Jim,

    Quite frankly can you believe him if he told you all he did was the website for Reynolds? I mean, seriously, can he ever be trusted again? Not by me.

  26. I think he’s as trustworthy as Ben Tribbett is. Take that for what you will.

    Also, one of the other contributors here on Virtucon gave me a background story about what a sore loser Joe can be after he beat Joe in a campaign a few years back.

  27. [...] The joker in question is a guy by the name of Joe Stanley. who quite frankly, I’d never heard of before. He admits his role in this particularly stupid little escapade in an email reposted over at Virginia Virtucon. [...]

  28. “While the end product is far less repugnant than pedophilia, no fewer individuals are hurt by the organization.”

    Someone please enlighten me. Who are all these people being hurt by a blog alliance? I’m thinking they must be people with thin skins and/or sorry lives.

    Thanks for outing this guy, RNO’R.

  29. Oh, and thanks to Daily Whackjob for their work researching it, too.

  30. Do you really think anybody cares what you say, “Republitarian?”

  31. Republitarian is allowed to post here again?

    He does have a point… let’s just ignore Ben and Joe and move on with our lives.

    Then again, how many times has the blogosphere resolved to sideline Ben and then… gone back on their word like Kaine on his campaign promises?

  32. [...] in hand and a confession by Mr. Stanley show that he was the one who purchased the domain name and then set it to forward to [...]

  33. [...] in hand and a confession by Mr. Stanley show that he was the one who purchased the domain name and then set it to forward to [...]

  34. [...] of course the email from Stanley admitting his part on Virginia [...]

  35. Sounds like what Joe Stanley did is pretty awful. I think you’re spot on in criticizing it as “done with malice” and ” funny in some sort of juvenile way”.

    While you are criticizing Joe and Ben for their juvenile humor, your entire comments section turns into a “fattie, fattie” hate fest the likes of which most people grow out of in 3rd grade, if not 7th grade at the latest.

    People come in all shapes and sizes. Instead of sticking to legitimate criticisms of Joe’s behavior, you guys abandom legitimate criticisms to make fun of him for being fat! That’s pathetic.

Leave a Reply