• Follow us now on

    "That some should be rich, shows that others may become rich, and, hence, is just encouragement to industry and enterprise."

    -- President Abraham Lincoln - 1864


    "The supply-side claim is not a claim. It is empirically true and historically convincing that with lower rates of taxation on labor and capital, the factors of production, you'll get a bigger economy."

    -- U.S. Rep. Jack Kemp



  • Special Election – Jan 12, 2010

  • 2010

  • 2013

  • SeaWorld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund

    In a fight between Jim Webb and Ollie North, who would win? Oh, that's right, we already know the answer to that question.



      Republicans

    • Atlanta, GA
    • Indianapolis, IN
    • San Antonio, TX
    • Democrats

    • Like we care.

  • Current Poll Questions

    No Current Polls.

    Visit Our Sponsors

    Advertise here

    Join Team Sarah!




  • Open Threads

  • Poll Accuracy Based Results

    Election 2009 actual results: Bob McDonnell 58.6 percent for a 17.4 percent margin of victory. Virtucon rankings are based upon total amount the two numbers deviate from the actual numbers.

    1. Survey USA (10/30-11/1) – 58% / 18% (deviation 1.2%)

    2. VCU (10/21-25) – 54% / 18% (deviation 5.2%)

    3. (TIE) PPP (10/31-11/1) – 56% / 14% (deviation 6%)

    3. (TIE) Roanoke College (10/21-27) – 53% / 17% (deviation 6%)

    5. Suffolk Univ. (10/26-28) – 54% / 14% (deviation 8%)

    6. Rasmussen (10/27) – 54% / 13% (deviation 9%)

    7. Washington Post (10/22-25) – 55% / 11% (deviation 10%)

    8. Times Dispatch / Mason Dixon (10/28-29) – 53% / 12% (deviation 11%)

    9. Daily Kos / Research 2000 (10/26-28) – 54% / 10% (deviation 12%)

    10. Virginia Pilot / CNU (10/8-13) – 45% / 14% (deviation 17%)

    11. Clarus (10/18-19) – 49% / 8% (deviation 19%)


    Next time you see a poll, judge it by its past performance. Here is how they rank in terms of accuracy based upon the 2008 presidential election:

    1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**

    1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**

    3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)

    4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)

    5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*

    6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*

    6T. ARG (10/25-27)*

    8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)

    8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)

    10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)

    ----------------

    (If you're below DailyKos, you don't deserve to be taken seriously for another four years. Better luck in 2012.)

    11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)

    12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)

    13. FOX (11/1-2)

    14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)

    15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)

    16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)

    17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)

    18. Marist College (11/3)

    19. CBS (10/31-11/2)

    20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)

    21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)

    22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)

    23. Newsweak (10/22-23)

  • RSS Redskins Insider

Corey Stewart Cleared of Any Wrongdoing; Paul Ebert Guilty of Fudging Facts

BVBL breaks the news that PWC Chairman Corey Stewart has been cleared of any wrongdoing in relation to mailing out a notice to every household in the county regarding the recent vote to crack down on illegal aliens in PWC.  The special prosecutor found that the expenditure was “related to a public matter” and therefore a permissible use of discretionary funds.

The special prosecutor also made note that contrary to what was contained in the complaint, the website listed on Stewart’s mailer was a County Government web site and not “Black Velvet.”  Why on earth would Paul Ebert have alleged to the special prosecutor that BVBL was listed on Corey’s postcard when anyone could figure out in an instant that there was no such connection?  Could it be because BVBL has been a partner in the write-in campaign on behalf of Ebert’s opponent, Ham Sandwich?  Was this a weak attempt at retaliation against a private citizen who is disgruntled with the subpar service the county receives from Mr. Ebert & Co.?

Another question to be asked — why was the letter from the special prosecutor dated 10/26 not received until 11/2?  It takes a week for mail to get here from Chesterfield?  And wouldn’t these findings have previously been made known to Mr. Ebert via telephone, email or fax given the time sensitive nature of this investigation in relation to the pending election?  Did Mr. Ebert’s pal in Chesterfield date the letter last Friday and not have it sent out until Monday?  Even then, it took a full 5 days to reach PWC?  Did it arrive today by mistake when in fact they had hoped it would not arrive until this coming Monday when it would be too late for Corey’s exhonoration to be made public? 

Send Ebert and his cronies packing on Election Day.

WRITE-IN HAM SANDWICH FOR PWC COMMONWEALTH’S ATTORNEY!!!

One Response

  1. Why can’t anyone see how dirty he is? He withheld information in the Justin Wolfe case and Justin now sits on death row. Ehbert does not care about the truth-just winning! How can our VA courts be so bad? How do we help Justin get a fair trial?

Leave a Reply