• Follow us now on

    "That some should be rich, shows that others may become rich, and, hence, is just encouragement to industry and enterprise."

    -- President Abraham Lincoln - 1864


    "The supply-side claim is not a claim. It is empirically true and historically convincing that with lower rates of taxation on labor and capital, the factors of production, you'll get a bigger economy."

    -- U.S. Rep. Jack Kemp



  • Special Election – Jan 12, 2010

  • 2010

  • 2013

  • SeaWorld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund

    In a fight between Jim Webb and Ollie North, who would win? Oh, that's right, we already know the answer to that question.



      Republicans

    • Atlanta, GA
    • Indianapolis, IN
    • San Antonio, TX
    • Democrats

    • Like we care.

  • Current Poll Questions

    No Current Polls.

    Visit Our Sponsors

    Advertise here

    Join Team Sarah!




  • Open Threads

  • Poll Accuracy Based Results

    Election 2009 actual results: Bob McDonnell 58.6 percent for a 17.4 percent margin of victory. Virtucon rankings are based upon total amount the two numbers deviate from the actual numbers.

    1. Survey USA (10/30-11/1) – 58% / 18% (deviation 1.2%)

    2. VCU (10/21-25) – 54% / 18% (deviation 5.2%)

    3. (TIE) PPP (10/31-11/1) – 56% / 14% (deviation 6%)

    3. (TIE) Roanoke College (10/21-27) – 53% / 17% (deviation 6%)

    5. Suffolk Univ. (10/26-28) – 54% / 14% (deviation 8%)

    6. Rasmussen (10/27) – 54% / 13% (deviation 9%)

    7. Washington Post (10/22-25) – 55% / 11% (deviation 10%)

    8. Times Dispatch / Mason Dixon (10/28-29) – 53% / 12% (deviation 11%)

    9. Daily Kos / Research 2000 (10/26-28) – 54% / 10% (deviation 12%)

    10. Virginia Pilot / CNU (10/8-13) – 45% / 14% (deviation 17%)

    11. Clarus (10/18-19) – 49% / 8% (deviation 19%)


    Next time you see a poll, judge it by its past performance. Here is how they rank in terms of accuracy based upon the 2008 presidential election:

    1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**

    1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**

    3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)

    4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)

    5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*

    6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*

    6T. ARG (10/25-27)*

    8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)

    8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)

    10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)

    ----------------

    (If you're below DailyKos, you don't deserve to be taken seriously for another four years. Better luck in 2012.)

    11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)

    12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)

    13. FOX (11/1-2)

    14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)

    15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)

    16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)

    17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)

    18. Marist College (11/3)

    19. CBS (10/31-11/2)

    20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)

    21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)

    22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)

    23. Newsweak (10/22-23)

  • RSS Redskins Insider

Nohe Spearheads PWC Opposition To HB 6055

On Tuesday, July 8, Prince William County Supevisor Marty Nohe (R-Coles) will bring the following resolution opposing HB 6055 before the BOCS:

July 8, 2008
Regular Meeting
Res. No. 08-

MOTION:
SECOND:

RE: CALL ON THE VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO REJECT THE INEQUITIES OF THE SOURCES OF REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDING AND LOCAL TAXATION OF STATE TRANSPORTATION RESPONSIBILITIES AS PROPOSED IN HB 6055

ACTION:

WHEREAS, the Prince William Board of County Supervisors adopted Resolution 08-660 on June 17, 2008 calling on the Virginia General Assembly to adequately and appropriately address transportation funding at Special Session II on Transportation that convened on June 23, 2008; and

WHEREAS, Resolution 08-660 also called on the General Assembly not to require local governments to impose taxes and fees needed for regional transportation funding since the transportation network is the responsibility of the Commonwealth of Virginia; and

WHEREAS, the Rules Committee of the House of Delegates has reported without recommendation HB 6055 (Hamilton) that would have Northern Virginia local governments impose several taxes and fees for regional transportation purposes that in the cumulative compose over 92% of the revenues for the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA); and

WHEREAS, HB 6055 as currently proposed would impose several new state taxes and fees and allocate 30% of the income tax revenue generated by the Port of Virginia for regional transportation projects in Hampton Roads in such a manner that the State would be imposing or providing all of the revenues needed for that region’s transportation projects; and

WHEREAS, HB 6055 would require the NVTA to consult with the Northern Virginia Delegation to the General Assembly delegation on the use of such funds; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Prince William Board of County Supervisors calls on the General Assembly to reject the pending inequity of State and locally imposed taxes for regional transportation projects found in HB 6055; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board opposes any required consultation with regional members of the General Assembly since such members already serve on the NVTA; and.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board reiterates its opposition to any attempts to require local governments to enact taxes and fees to fund regional transportation needs that are the responsibility of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Votes:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent from Vote:
Absent from Meeting:

For Information: Prince William County Legislative Delegation

CERTIFIED COPY ___________________________________________________________

Clerk to the Board

 

This is an excellent move by Marty and mirrors in many ways my own opposition to this horrendous bill.

2 Responses

  1. Go Marty!!!

  2. [...] and elected officials. In fact, today the Prince William BOCS (GOP majority of 6-2) is set to vote on a resolution opposing HB 6055. Republicans have an opportunity here to reclaim the mantle of low taxes, fiscal [...]

Leave a Reply