• Follow us now on

    "That some should be rich, shows that others may become rich, and, hence, is just encouragement to industry and enterprise."

    -- President Abraham Lincoln - 1864


    "The supply-side claim is not a claim. It is empirically true and historically convincing that with lower rates of taxation on labor and capital, the factors of production, you'll get a bigger economy."

    -- U.S. Rep. Jack Kemp



  • Special Election – Jan 12, 2010

  • 2010

  • 2013

  • SeaWorld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund

    In a fight between Jim Webb and Ollie North, who would win? Oh, that's right, we already know the answer to that question.



      Republicans

    • Atlanta, GA
    • Indianapolis, IN
    • San Antonio, TX
    • Democrats

    • Like we care.

  • Current Poll Questions

    No Current Polls.

    Visit Our Sponsors

    Advertise here

    Join Team Sarah!




  • Open Threads

  • Poll Accuracy Based Results

    Election 2009 actual results: Bob McDonnell 58.6 percent for a 17.4 percent margin of victory. Virtucon rankings are based upon total amount the two numbers deviate from the actual numbers.

    1. Survey USA (10/30-11/1) – 58% / 18% (deviation 1.2%)

    2. VCU (10/21-25) – 54% / 18% (deviation 5.2%)

    3. (TIE) PPP (10/31-11/1) – 56% / 14% (deviation 6%)

    3. (TIE) Roanoke College (10/21-27) – 53% / 17% (deviation 6%)

    5. Suffolk Univ. (10/26-28) – 54% / 14% (deviation 8%)

    6. Rasmussen (10/27) – 54% / 13% (deviation 9%)

    7. Washington Post (10/22-25) – 55% / 11% (deviation 10%)

    8. Times Dispatch / Mason Dixon (10/28-29) – 53% / 12% (deviation 11%)

    9. Daily Kos / Research 2000 (10/26-28) – 54% / 10% (deviation 12%)

    10. Virginia Pilot / CNU (10/8-13) – 45% / 14% (deviation 17%)

    11. Clarus (10/18-19) – 49% / 8% (deviation 19%)


    Next time you see a poll, judge it by its past performance. Here is how they rank in terms of accuracy based upon the 2008 presidential election:

    1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**

    1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**

    3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)

    4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)

    5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*

    6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*

    6T. ARG (10/25-27)*

    8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)

    8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)

    10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)

    ----------------

    (If you're below DailyKos, you don't deserve to be taken seriously for another four years. Better luck in 2012.)

    11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)

    12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)

    13. FOX (11/1-2)

    14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)

    15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)

    16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)

    17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)

    18. Marist College (11/3)

    19. CBS (10/31-11/2)

    20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)

    21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)

    22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)

    23. Newsweak (10/22-23)

  • RSS Redskins Insider

Storm Clouds On Horizon for Mark Warner

We’ve been hearing that something big was going to drop ever since Marky Mark declared for U.S. Senate after suddenly and mysteriously dropping out of the presidential race only months earlier for “family reasons” having already, in his own words, made:

67 trips to 28 states and five foreign countries;

headlined 86 events in 25 states to help raise or directly donate $7.3 million to Democrats this cycle;

Forward Together [Marky Mark's Leadership PAC] has contributed more money this year to Democratic candidates and party organizations than any other federal leadership PAC.

Most notably, Virtucon contributor Rittinger uncovered the role that Team Clinton political hitman Howard Wolfson played in Marky Mark’s withdrawl from the presidential race.

As Rittinger put it:

The message went out among some of Warner’s people that this was war and that while Clinton had won this battle, it would be at a significant cost.

Well, you don’t go to war with the Clintons if you’re not fully prepared and frankly, Marky Mark and his Flunky Bunch are nowhere near being in the same league as the Clintons when it comes to political skullduggery. Did he honestly think that members of Team Clinton wouldn’t seek revenge and retribution? Is Mark Warner really that dumb to think that they wouldn’t pull out their dossier on him to do so once they had nothing left to lose? Apparently so.

Now the storm clouds are on the horizon for Warner.  Wolfson has joined FOX News Channel as a contributor.  Hillary won’t be Barry’s running mate, so her crew will be free to go about behind the scenes exacting vengence wherever they see fit.  Mark Warner is very high on that list.

UPDATE:  It seems that Team Obama is making it even easier for Team Clinton to go rogue with the apparent failure of unity within the Dem party.

3 Responses

  1. [...] Riley seems to think so:  Storm Clouds on Horizon for Mark Warner [...]

  2. [...] asked the question a couple of weeks ago, and noted that Riley was speculating Clinton revenge against Mark Warner for not doing their bidding.  Is Riley onto [...]

  3. [...] this rate, I suspect we will be seeing sometime in Sept. or Oct. exactly what evidence of dirt the Clinton campaign dug up on Mark Warner that they used to push him out of the presidential [...]

Leave a Reply