Election 2009 actual results: Bob McDonnell 58.6 percent for a 17.4 percent margin of victory. Virtucon rankings are based upon total amount the two numbers deviate from the actual numbers.
1. Survey USA (10/30-11/1) – 58% / 18% (deviation 1.2%)
2. VCU (10/21-25) – 54% / 18% (deviation 5.2%)
3. (TIE) PPP (10/31-11/1) – 56% / 14% (deviation 6%)
3. (TIE) Roanoke College (10/21-27) – 53% / 17% (deviation 6%)
5. Suffolk Univ. (10/26-28) – 54% / 14% (deviation 8%)
6. Rasmussen (10/27) – 54% / 13% (deviation 9%)
7. Washington Post (10/22-25) – 55% / 11% (deviation 10%)
8. Times Dispatch / Mason Dixon (10/28-29) – 53% / 12% (deviation 11%)
9. Daily Kos / Research 2000 (10/26-28) – 54% / 10% (deviation 12%)
10. Virginia Pilot / CNU (10/8-13) – 45% / 14% (deviation 17%)
11. Clarus (10/18-19) – 49% / 8% (deviation 19%)
Next time you see a poll, judge it by its past performance. Here is how they rank in terms of accuracy based upon the 2008 presidential election:
MOST ACCURATE:
1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**
1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**
3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)
4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)
5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*
6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*
6T. ARG (10/25-27)*
8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)
8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)
POLL REVEALED TO BE FRAUDULENT AND REPUDIATED BY DAILYKOS:
10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)
----------------
(If you're below DailyKos, you don't deserve to be taken seriously for another four years. Better luck in 2012.)
POLLS THAT WERE WORSE THAN A FRAUDULENT POLL:
11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)
12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)
13. FOX (11/1-2)
14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)
15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)
16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)
17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)
18. Marist College (11/3)
19. CBS (10/31-11/2)
20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)
21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)
22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)
23. Newsweak (10/22-23)
The Republican legislators who I have talked with or emailed on this subject, with the exception of Bob Marshall, seem to be out of ideas. The herd mentality is that they will pass this crap off as a “fix” to the problem.
I am convinced that forces that remain invisible to the typical citizen are trying to control this issue for their own financial interests. I don’t see many Republicans or Democrats standing up for our citizens.
Speaker Howell and Phil Hamilton should be investigated for corruption. The appearance of corruption is present when these men and others suddenly and without any call from the citizens to do so, start pushing hard for privately owned toll roads here in Virginia. Either these men are dumb or they are dishonest, those are the only two conclusions left regarding their advocacy of these foreign owned toll roads.
Related to this issue: I heard a radio ad run by that corporate lobbying group, Americans for Prosperity (just the fluffy name should send up red flags and sound warning alarms). The ad claims that those darned Democrats want a thirty-three percent gas tax increase.
What they don’t say, of course, is that the average driver would be only impacted $15 annually by the gas tax increase, and such a measure would make for a simple and easily audited revenue stream for transportation. If you add this measure to targeted cuts, some gas-guzzler fees and a bond issue,our transportation issue would be resolved.
However, a clean, clear-cut revenue stream, such as a gas tax increase does not create business opportunities for multinational toll road companies to rape Virginians for the next several decades. I can see where AFP is on this issue.
[...] the General Assembly reconvenes today, much chatter is going on across the blogs about 1st Congressional District GOP Chiar Tom Foley’s letter (which advances nothing, by the way) and how Republicans must now make a principled stand to block [...]