Election 2009 actual results: Bob McDonnell 58.6 percent for a 17.4 percent margin of victory. Virtucon rankings are based upon total amount the two numbers deviate from the actual numbers.
1. Survey USA (10/30-11/1) – 58% / 18% (deviation 1.2%)
2. VCU (10/21-25) – 54% / 18% (deviation 5.2%)
3. (TIE) PPP (10/31-11/1) – 56% / 14% (deviation 6%)
3. (TIE) Roanoke College (10/21-27) – 53% / 17% (deviation 6%)
5. Suffolk Univ. (10/26-28) – 54% / 14% (deviation 8%)
6. Rasmussen (10/27) – 54% / 13% (deviation 9%)
7. Washington Post (10/22-25) – 55% / 11% (deviation 10%)
8. Times Dispatch / Mason Dixon (10/28-29) – 53% / 12% (deviation 11%)
9. Daily Kos / Research 2000 (10/26-28) – 54% / 10% (deviation 12%)
10. Virginia Pilot / CNU (10/8-13) – 45% / 14% (deviation 17%)
11. Clarus (10/18-19) – 49% / 8% (deviation 19%)
Next time you see a poll, judge it by its past performance. Here is how they rank in terms of accuracy based upon the 2008 presidential election:
1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**
1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**
3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)
4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)
5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*
6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*
6T. ARG (10/25-27)*
8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)
8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)
10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)
----------------
(If you're below DailyKos, you don't deserve to be taken seriously for another four years. Better luck in 2012.)
11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)
12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)
13. FOX (11/1-2)
14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)
15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)
16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)
17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)
18. Marist College (11/3)
19. CBS (10/31-11/2)
20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)
21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)
22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)
23. Newsweak (10/22-23)
2011 will be an interesting election. See where the re-districting lines are drawn – and the let the games begin.
If Obama is President, 2011 will be good for Republicans in Virginia. If McCain is President, I don’t know.
Odds are the biggest primary story will be in the 24th Senate District.
I’m curious to see if the Dems draw up a more Hanger-friendly district out there. The current lines seemed designed more to protect RINOs than the GOP majorities. The Dems won the Senate last year with FEWER votes than the Republicans had.
In 2000, the Senate lines were drawn to protect incumbents, not to maximize the majority Republicans. The only incumbent who was not protected was Leslie Byrne, who was unpopular with Senators in both parties. In 2010, I think the Senate will still draw the lines protect incumbents, not to maximize the majority party, even if it is Democrats.
In 2000, the House lines were drawn to maximize Republican and minority Democrat seats. Non-minority Democrats were the odd men out. I think in 2010, the Republicans will still be in the majority and will still draw the lines to maximize Republican and minority Democrat seats.
2011 will be a good year for PWC, because our own Jim Riley will have the opporunity to fill the Dumfries Seat on the PWC BOCS (that is if Maureen Caddigan decides to step aside).
That is flattering, Scott. Obviously, I would only consider this if Maureen decided against running for another term AND I had a compelling reason to run myself. I’m not one who will run for an office just in order to be someone — if I ever do run for something, it will be because there is something I want to accomplish in that particular position.