• Join Virtucon on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow us now on

  • 2012 Presidential Election Gallup Daily Tracking Poll

    Based on continuous five-day rolling averages. The initial report on 4/16 is based on interviews with 2,265 registered voters.

    Gallup Daily Tracking Poll

  • The Virtucon Poll

  • Nov. 6, 2012

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidates:

    U.S. Senate

    U.S. House

    1st Dist.

    2nd Dist.

    4th Dist.

    5th Dist. 6th Dist.

    7th Dist.

    9th Dist.

    10th Dist.

    11th Dist.

  • Nov. 5, 2013

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidates:

    Virginia Lt. Governor

  • VV RINO Watch List

    The following "Republicans" have been added to Virtucon's RINO Watch List based upon their votes and statements on a variety of issues ranging from economic to social to government reform:

    Virginia Senators:

    Harry Blevins

    Tommy Norment

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

  • Virtucon Supports the Following Legislation:

    HB 1 Unborn children; construing the word "person" under Virginia law to include.

    H.B. 1 WAS KILLED IN THE SENATE BY THE FOLLOWING RINOS: Harry Blevins

    Tommy Norment

    Frank Ruff

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

    SB 244 Primary elections; voter registration by political party.

    S.B. 244 WAS DEFEATED BY THE FOLLOWING RINOS: Harry Blevins

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

    SB 56 Elections; party identification on ballots in local elections.

    SB 55 Voter identification requirements; revises list of items a voter may show to prove identification.

    HB 1060 Citizenship of arrestee; if accused is not committed to jail, arresting officer to ascertain.

    H.B. 1060 WAS KILLED IN COMMITTEE BY THE FOLLOWING RINO: Tommy Norment

  • Advertise here

    Visit Our Sponsors

    Paid Advertisement


    SeaWorld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund


  • Poll Accuracy Based Results

    Election 2009 actual results: Bob McDonnell 58.6 percent for a 17.4 percent margin of victory. Virtucon rankings are based upon total amount the two numbers deviate from the actual numbers.

    1. Survey USA (10/30-11/1) – 58% / 18% (deviation 1.2%)

    2. VCU (10/21-25) – 54% / 18% (deviation 5.2%)

    3. (TIE) PPP (10/31-11/1) – 56% / 14% (deviation 6%)

    3. (TIE) Roanoke College (10/21-27) – 53% / 17% (deviation 6%)

    5. Suffolk Univ. (10/26-28) – 54% / 14% (deviation 8%)

    6. Rasmussen (10/27) – 54% / 13% (deviation 9%)

    7. Washington Post (10/22-25) – 55% / 11% (deviation 10%)

    8. Times Dispatch / Mason Dixon (10/28-29) – 53% / 12% (deviation 11%)

    9. Daily Kos / Research 2000 (10/26-28) – 54% / 10% (deviation 12%)

    10. Virginia Pilot / CNU (10/8-13) – 45% / 14% (deviation 17%)

    11. Clarus (10/18-19) – 49% / 8% (deviation 19%)


    Next time you see a poll, judge it by its past performance. Here is how they rank in terms of accuracy based upon the 2008 presidential election:

    MOST ACCURATE:

    1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**

    1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**

    3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)

    4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)

    5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*

    6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*

    6T. ARG (10/25-27)*

    8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)

    8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)

    POLL REVEALED TO BE FRAUDULENT AND REPUDIATED BY DAILYKOS:

    10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)

    ----------------

    (If you're below DailyKos, you don't deserve to be taken seriously for another four years. Better luck in 2012.)

    POLLS THAT WERE WORSE THAN A FRAUDULENT POLL:

    11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)

    12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)

    13. FOX (11/1-2)

    14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)

    15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)

    16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)

    17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)

    18. Marist College (11/3)

    19. CBS (10/31-11/2)

    20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)

    21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)

    22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)

    23. Newsweak (10/22-23)

“All those other presidents on the dollar bills”

Looks like Barry Obama is first to raise the issue of race openly in the general election campaign –

Yesterday in Missouri, Obama predicted McCain and the GOP would use racially tinged attacks against him.

“What they’re going to try to do is make you scared of me,” Obama said. ”You know, he doesn’t look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills.” 

An Obama spokesman denied that the line about “dollar bills” was related to the Democrat’s race.

So, if the line Obama uttered about “dollar bills” wasn’t about race, what was it about? 

“What Barack Obama was talking about was that he didn’t get here after spending decades in Washington,” Gibbs said. “There is nothing more to this than the fact that he was describing that he was new to the political scene. He was referring to the fact that he didn’t come into the race with the history of others. It is not about race.”

This is disingenuous for his campaign to claim that isn’t what Obama was talking about without providing a feasible alternative explanation and this one just doesn’t hold water.

UPDATE:  Obama was much clearer in an earlier speech that he WAS referring to race:

They’re going to try to make you afraid of me. He’s young and inexperienced and he’s got a funny name. And did I mention he’s black?

Let’s look at exactly who is and was on U.S. currency.  According to the Treasury Dept.:

United States currency notes now in production bear the following portraits: George Washington on the $1 bill, Thomas Jefferson on the $2 bill, Abraham Lincoln on the $5 bill, Alexander Hamilton on the $10 bill, Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill, Ulysses S. Grant on the $50 bill, and Benjamin Franklin on the $100 bill.

There are also several denominations of currency notes that are no longer produced. These include the $500 bill with the portrait of William McKinley, the $1,000 bill with a portrait of Grover Cleveland, the $5,000 bill with a portrait of James Madison, the $10,000 bill with a portrait of Salmon P. Chase, and the $100,000 currency note bearing a portrait of Woodrow Wilson.

For the record (and for Barry so that he doesn’t get all confused again as he did when he claimed there were 57 states or that presidents could serve 10 years in office), the “other presidents” (did I miss an election and inauguration somehow?) who appear on current dollar bills are: Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Jackson, and Grant.  None of them spent “decades in Washington” before becoming president.  Even among those who appear on bills no longer produced — McKinley, Cleveland, Madison and Wilson — none of them spent decades in Washington, either.  Just who does Barry think is on our currency and what does he think he knows about them?

Finally, on the issue of race, AP states in their article that Obama is “the first black candidate with a shot at winning the White House.”  This is factually incorrect.  First, Obama is multi-racial with an African father and a white mother.  Second, even if one were to concede that he is black and not multi-racial, while he is the first such nominee of a major political party, he is hardly the first with a shot at winning.  Anything can happen in the course of a political campaign so if you’re in the race, you’ve got a shot.  Heck, way back in 1872 Frederick Douglass was nominated for Vice President on the Equal Rights Party ticket.  (Had AP said “a legitimate shot,” then they would have been more accurate, but that probably would have ticked off Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.)

Race has no business in this or any election — either being used against a minority candidate or by a minority candidate to garner sympathy.  Is Obama really trying to come off as a victim here?  I don’t know anyone who opposes Obama based on his race, but I do know plenty of people who oppose him based on his liberal voting record and flawed policy positions.

7 Responses

  1. [...] Riley over at VV has the details: Looks like Barry Obama is first to raise the issue of race openly in the general election campaign – Yesterday in Missouri, Obama predicted McCain and the GOP would use racially tinged attacks against him. [...]

  2. [...] read Jim’s take at Virginia Virtucon and DJ’s at Right-wing Liberal. addthis_url = [...]

  3. Obama is most DEFINITELY the first black with “a shot at winning”.

    Fredrick Douglass was nominated for VICE PRESIDENT, not PRESIDENT. Jesse Jackson ran and if you are old enough to remember that, you’ll also know that he was very, very far from being elected.

  4. Thank you for stating the obvious which I already wrote and qualified, Mo. You really do need to work on your reading comprehension skills. I’m sure that there are some workbooks you can order through Amazon.com that can be of help.

    First, do you consider Barry to be black or multi-racial? For the record, I find it offensive that we still qualify ANYONE by the color of their skin and therefore I put down “human” in answer to the question of “race” on the census forms that I get. But if we are to take race into account, then shouldn’t we at least be accurate here and acknowledge that Barry is biracial?

    Second, I SAID that F. Douglass was nominated for VP and threw that out there simply to show that a black being nominated for such a high position, albeit the second highest office in the land, first happened 136 years ago.

    Of course Jesse Jackson didn’t win the nomination in either ’84 or ’88, but he was taken seriously (even if he shouldn’t have been) and included in the Democratic primary debates and received major media attention.

  5. (Professor) Riley comes over as rather a nasty person; can’t seem to comment on anything I write without snide remarks.

    FYI, I consider Obama first of the HUMAN race and, like you, that’s how I describe myself (you’ll probably object to that statement – sub-human maybe) on any form that asks that stupid question. Of course, in a utopian society, race shouldn’t enter into ANYthing, but it does.

    I’d disagree with you that Obama is “biracial”. Who knows what genes are in his background. He might be as multiracial as Tiger Woods.

  6. Mo, I only make snide remarks about your comments when they are deserving. This post that you wrote was clear headed and showed that you thought before you pressed Submit. I applaud you for that and therefore you receive no such remarks for this one. I simply enjoy a good debate and the more polished the opponent the better.

    I would never refer to ANY person as sub-human as that would degrade the gift of life that God has bestowed upon each of us.

    Based upon what we know, Barry is biracial, but I have also used the term multiracial with regard to him, so I don’t fault you for that.

  7. Oh look, here we have the McCain campaign making Obama look silly by putting him on the one hundred dollar bill.

    …One whole month ago…

    Hrm…

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 57 other followers