• Join Virtucon on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow us now on

  • 2012 Presidential Election Gallup Daily Tracking Poll

    Based on continuous five-day rolling averages. The initial report on 4/16 is based on interviews with 2,265 registered voters.

    Gallup Daily Tracking Poll

  • The Virtucon Poll

  • Nov. 6, 2012

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidates:

    U.S. Senate

    U.S. House

    1st Dist.

    2nd Dist.

    4th Dist.

    5th Dist. 6th Dist.

    7th Dist.

    9th Dist.

    10th Dist.

    11th Dist.

  • Nov. 5, 2013

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidates:

    Virginia Lt. Governor

  • VV RINO Watch List

    The following "Republicans" have been added to Virtucon's RINO Watch List based upon their votes and statements on a variety of issues ranging from economic to social to government reform:

    Virginia Senators:

    Harry Blevins

    Tommy Norment

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

  • Virtucon Supports the Following Legislation:

    HB 1 Unborn children; construing the word "person" under Virginia law to include.

    H.B. 1 WAS KILLED IN THE SENATE BY THE FOLLOWING RINOS: Harry Blevins

    Tommy Norment

    Frank Ruff

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

    SB 244 Primary elections; voter registration by political party.

    S.B. 244 WAS DEFEATED BY THE FOLLOWING RINOS: Harry Blevins

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

    SB 56 Elections; party identification on ballots in local elections.

    SB 55 Voter identification requirements; revises list of items a voter may show to prove identification.

    HB 1060 Citizenship of arrestee; if accused is not committed to jail, arresting officer to ascertain.

    H.B. 1060 WAS KILLED IN COMMITTEE BY THE FOLLOWING RINO: Tommy Norment

  • Advertise here

    Visit Our Sponsors

    Paid Advertisement


    SeaWorld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund


  • Poll Accuracy Based Results

    Election 2009 actual results: Bob McDonnell 58.6 percent for a 17.4 percent margin of victory. Virtucon rankings are based upon total amount the two numbers deviate from the actual numbers.

    1. Survey USA (10/30-11/1) – 58% / 18% (deviation 1.2%)

    2. VCU (10/21-25) – 54% / 18% (deviation 5.2%)

    3. (TIE) PPP (10/31-11/1) – 56% / 14% (deviation 6%)

    3. (TIE) Roanoke College (10/21-27) – 53% / 17% (deviation 6%)

    5. Suffolk Univ. (10/26-28) – 54% / 14% (deviation 8%)

    6. Rasmussen (10/27) – 54% / 13% (deviation 9%)

    7. Washington Post (10/22-25) – 55% / 11% (deviation 10%)

    8. Times Dispatch / Mason Dixon (10/28-29) – 53% / 12% (deviation 11%)

    9. Daily Kos / Research 2000 (10/26-28) – 54% / 10% (deviation 12%)

    10. Virginia Pilot / CNU (10/8-13) – 45% / 14% (deviation 17%)

    11. Clarus (10/18-19) – 49% / 8% (deviation 19%)


    Next time you see a poll, judge it by its past performance. Here is how they rank in terms of accuracy based upon the 2008 presidential election:

    MOST ACCURATE:

    1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**

    1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**

    3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)

    4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)

    5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*

    6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*

    6T. ARG (10/25-27)*

    8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)

    8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)

    POLL REVEALED TO BE FRAUDULENT AND REPUDIATED BY DAILYKOS:

    10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)

    ----------------

    (If you're below DailyKos, you don't deserve to be taken seriously for another four years. Better luck in 2012.)

    POLLS THAT WERE WORSE THAN A FRAUDULENT POLL:

    11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)

    12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)

    13. FOX (11/1-2)

    14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)

    15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)

    16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)

    17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)

    18. Marist College (11/3)

    19. CBS (10/31-11/2)

    20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)

    21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)

    22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)

    23. Newsweak (10/22-23)

VIRTUCON EXCLUSIVE: Rob Wittman’s New Earmark Policy Goes Into Effect

U.S. Rep. Rob Wittman has long sought to keep earmarks and federal spending under control.  For instance, on July 24, 2009, Wittman offered an amendment to cut 0.5% or $803,270,000 from the Labor, Health and Human Services appropriations bill, which is the largest of the 12 annual appropriations bills. The bill was set to receive an increase of 12% funding, meaning his amendment would have cut the increase to 11.5%. Legislators voted against his amendment by 199-229.  Some of the floor debate can be seen here:

It was at this point that he realized if they could not even cut 1/2 of 1%, the process was so broken, that he could no longer participate in the appropraiations (or earmark) process.  In the past, the only times he would even request an earmark was if a locality within his congressional district requested it and the earmark required the locality to produce matching funds of its own to receive the federal funds.

After talking with numerous constituents about this issue, he and his staff worked hard for the past several months to develop further restrictions on federal earmarks.  Under his new policy which went into effect in December, the only earmarks that he will request will be for national defense and he must first receive a request from the federal agency seeking it before he will even consider submitting it.  All localities within the First District have now been notified as to the change as such requests from them will no longer be considered.

This goes to show that Rob Wittman is precisely the type of representative that the people of America’s First Congressional District expect to have fighting for them in Washington.  This sort of leadership should be held up as an example for Republicans everywhere as they fight to shake off their Tom DeLay “hangover” where he envisioned Republicans earmarking their way into a permanent majority.  (That worked out about as well as DeLay’s “Dancing With The Stars” appearance.)

6 Responses

  1. Rob Wittman is a gentleman and a man of honor. Wittman for President in 2012!

  2. I do not understand why Rob Wittman will take any earmarks for our district. The Country is going broke, quit increasing spending period, for that matter reduce spending from 2008. Wake up America, we are not entitled to these earmarks, they come with strings and it is blood money.

  3. Conservative Fembot, on January 22nd, 2010 at 1:50 pm Said:

    “Rob Wittman is a gentleman and a man of honor. Wittman for President in 2012!”

    SERIOUSLY?

  4. Well then, SST, how about U.S. Senate?

  5. Seriously?

  6. [...] Rob Wittman (R-VA01) has decided that he will no longer consider submitting earmarks, says Virginia Virtucon. Under his new policy which went into effect in December, the only earmarks that he will request [...]

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 59 other followers