• VV RINO Watch List

    The following "Republicans" have been added to Virtucon's RINO Watch List based upon their votes and statements on a variety of issues ranging from economic to social to government reform:

    Virginia Senators:

    Harry Blevins

    Tommy Norment

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

  • The Virtucon Poll

  • Virtucon Supports the Following Legislation:

    HB 1 Unborn children; construing the word "person" under Virginia law to include.

    H.B. 1 WAS KILLED IN THE SENATE BY THE FOLLOWING RINOS: Harry Blevins

    Tommy Norment

    Frank Ruff

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

    SB 244 Primary elections; voter registration by political party.

    S.B. 244 WAS DEFEATED BY THE FOLLOWING RINOS: Harry Blevins

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

    SB 56 Elections; party identification on ballots in local elections.

    SB 55 Voter identification requirements; revises list of items a voter may show to prove identification.

    HB 1060 Citizenship of arrestee; if accused is not committed to jail, arresting officer to ascertain.

    H.B. 1060 WAS KILLED IN COMMITTEE BY THE FOLLOWING RINO: Tommy Norment

  • March 6, 2012 GOP Primary

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidate:

    NO ONE - Cast a blank ballot and UNDER VOTE. Let's send an UNCOMMITTED delegation to the GOP convention in Tampa!

  • April 3, 2012

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidate:

    Supervisor, Stafford County - Garrisonville District

  • May 1, 2012

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidates:

    Mayor, Town of Dumfries

  • Nov. 6, 2012

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidates:

    U.S. Senate

    U.S. House

    1st Dist.

    2nd Dist.

    4th Dist.

    5th Dist. 6th Dist.

    7th Dist.

    9th Dist.

    10th Dist.

    11th Dist.

  • Nov. 5, 2013

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidates:

    Virginia Lt. Governor

  • Join Virtucon on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow us now on

  • Advertise here

    Visit Our Sponsors

    Paid Advertisement


    SeaWorld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund


  • Poll Accuracy Based Results

    Election 2009 actual results: Bob McDonnell 58.6 percent for a 17.4 percent margin of victory. Virtucon rankings are based upon total amount the two numbers deviate from the actual numbers.

    1. Survey USA (10/30-11/1) – 58% / 18% (deviation 1.2%)

    2. VCU (10/21-25) – 54% / 18% (deviation 5.2%)

    3. (TIE) PPP (10/31-11/1) – 56% / 14% (deviation 6%)

    3. (TIE) Roanoke College (10/21-27) – 53% / 17% (deviation 6%)

    5. Suffolk Univ. (10/26-28) – 54% / 14% (deviation 8%)

    6. Rasmussen (10/27) – 54% / 13% (deviation 9%)

    7. Washington Post (10/22-25) – 55% / 11% (deviation 10%)

    8. Times Dispatch / Mason Dixon (10/28-29) – 53% / 12% (deviation 11%)

    9. Daily Kos / Research 2000 (10/26-28) – 54% / 10% (deviation 12%)

    10. Virginia Pilot / CNU (10/8-13) – 45% / 14% (deviation 17%)

    11. Clarus (10/18-19) – 49% / 8% (deviation 19%)


    Next time you see a poll, judge it by its past performance. Here is how they rank in terms of accuracy based upon the 2008 presidential election:

    MOST ACCURATE:

    1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**

    1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**

    3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)

    4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)

    5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*

    6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*

    6T. ARG (10/25-27)*

    8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)

    8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)

    POLL REVEALED TO BE FRAUDULENT AND REPUDIATED BY DAILYKOS:

    10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)

    ----------------

    (If you're below DailyKos, you don't deserve to be taken seriously for another four years. Better luck in 2012.)

    POLLS THAT WERE WORSE THAN A FRAUDULENT POLL:

    11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)

    12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)

    13. FOX (11/1-2)

    14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)

    15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)

    16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)

    17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)

    18. Marist College (11/3)

    19. CBS (10/31-11/2)

    20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)

    21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)

    22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)

    23. Newsweak (10/22-23)

PWC Tea Party Patriots’ Statement on Adoption of County Budget

April 27, 2011

Dear Tea Party Patriots:

As you are aware the Prince William Board of Supervisors approved a nearly $900 million budget on April 26th. The budget passed on a 6-2 vote with Supervisors Mike May and John Stirrup voting against it. They also voted against the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The new tax rate starting July 1 will be $1.204 per $100 of assessed property value. This was lower than what was proposed by Melissa Preacor, County Executive. Incidentally, Ms. Preacor has a base salary of $210,000 vs. Governor McDonnell’s salary of $175,000. If you checked your recent property assessment notice you will more than likely find it went up from 3% to as much as 30% from 2010. So let there be no doubt in your mind that the increase in the budget is coming directly from you.

We wish to thank the many PWC tea party members who contacted Chairman Stewart and/or their local Supervisor to expressed their concerns and in some cases outrage at this tax and spend mentality. We were represented at the final budget hearing by five members of our tea party. Yale Schiffman, Deputy Chair spoke on behalf of the tea party. Tom Whitmore followed up on the article we recently sent you. Valerie Bond, Joanne Abbott and Chuck Jenks provided moral support to our speakers.

Chairman Stewart went on the attack after all citizen presentations came to a close. He was rather dismissive of the suggestion that we not undertake all the capital improvements at this time. He used the argument that it would cost more to borrow money and complete projects in the future. We don’t buy that line of reasoning. There isn’t any precise way to accurately predict the economic future. Chairman Stewart recognized that the state is supposed to build the roads. Yet, he was willing to let them off the hook and put the burden of making the road improvements on our backs. We’ve already paid the state via taxes and fees for the funds necessary for the road improvements. The Governor’s transportation plan allocated funds for Prince William County for roads. There was no need to raise our taxes to cover this cost. Chairman Stewart went on to make the point that building trails and expanding parks was a quality of life issue. It seemed like it was essential to him to make this happen. I guess your quality of life does not extend to paying your mortgage and dealing with the ever rising cost of food and gas. Chairman Stewart is playing Russian roulette with the budget process. He is hoping that the economy will continue to improve. We all hope for that. But the statistics on the condition of the housing market do not paint such a rosy picture. Median Sales prices over the past year are down 3.4%. In March 2011, they are down 7.4%. (Source: MRIS). The county relies on its real estate tax base to fund its budget. If Prince William County’s leadership continues this trend to spend and spend and spend into the future, you can do the math. Your taxes will continue to rise.

The only good news to report is that two Supervisors – Mike May of Occoquan and John Stirrup of Gainesville not only understand the tea party message but have the backbone to stand up to Chairman Stewart and the rest of the tax and spend Board. They voted against the Budget and the Capital Improvement Plan. They went as far as offering an alternative motion for a lower tax rate that would remove the markups including trails and libraries as well as some staff positions. Chairman Stewart was not happy and referred to Mike May’s motion as an unfriendly motion. As someone who is familiar with Robert’s Rules of Order, it is my opinion that it was not necessary to do that, except to show his displeasure at being challenged. Our hats are off to these two patriots. They deserve all the support we can give them during this upcoming election season. We want them to know that doing the “right thing” can have positive results.

Nancy and Yale Schiffman

Prince William County Tea Party Patriots

Advertisement

3 Responses

  1. fcs, Must you hang the name “Patriot” to anyone who agrees with your positions? For the first time, i agree with Stewart, and especially in the road-building needs……he didnt start the damn road program…was barely in diapers then….and what were the earlier supervisors supposed to do? Watch the traffic continue on roads like davis ford that was the parkway then.etc……..or sue the state……they would still be in court…….its easier to say YES we have needs than to simply deny any and everything so they can say they voted against more spending and are also f patriots!!!

  2. [...] in Prince William, a would-be candidate for U.S. Senate is reaching into taxpayers pockets for new parks. Meanwhile, [...]

  3. [...] in Prince William, a would-be candidate for U.S. Senate is reaching into taxpayers pockets for new parks. Meanwhile, [...]

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 47 other followers