• VV RINO Watch List

    The following "Republicans" have been added to Virtucon's RINO Watch List based upon their votes and statements on a variety of issues ranging from economic to social to government reform:

    Virginia Senators:

    Harry Blevins

    Tommy Norment

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

  • The Virtucon Poll

  • Virtucon Supports the Following Legislation:

    HB 1 Unborn children; construing the word "person" under Virginia law to include.

    H.B. 1 WAS KILLED IN THE SENATE BY THE FOLLOWING RINOS: Harry Blevins

    Tommy Norment

    Frank Ruff

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

    SB 244 Primary elections; voter registration by political party.

    S.B. 244 WAS DEFEATED BY THE FOLLOWING RINOS: Harry Blevins

    Walter Stosch

    Frank Wagner

    John Watkins

    SB 56 Elections; party identification on ballots in local elections.

    SB 55 Voter identification requirements; revises list of items a voter may show to prove identification.

    HB 1060 Citizenship of arrestee; if accused is not committed to jail, arresting officer to ascertain.

    H.B. 1060 WAS KILLED IN COMMITTEE BY THE FOLLOWING RINO: Tommy Norment

  • March 6, 2012 GOP Primary

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidate:

    NO ONE - Cast a blank ballot and UNDER VOTE. Let's send an UNCOMMITTED delegation to the GOP convention in Tampa!

  • April 3, 2012

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidate:

    Supervisor, Stafford County - Garrisonville District

  • May 1, 2012

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidates:

    Mayor, Town of Dumfries

  • Nov. 6, 2012

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidates:

    U.S. Senate

    U.S. House

    1st Dist.

    2nd Dist.

    4th Dist.

    5th Dist. 6th Dist.

    7th Dist.

    9th Dist.

    10th Dist.

    11th Dist.

  • Nov. 5, 2013

    Virtucon Endorsed Candidates:

    Virginia Lt. Governor

  • Join Virtucon on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow us now on

  • Advertise here

    Visit Our Sponsors

    Paid Advertisement


    SeaWorld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund


  • Poll Accuracy Based Results

    Election 2009 actual results: Bob McDonnell 58.6 percent for a 17.4 percent margin of victory. Virtucon rankings are based upon total amount the two numbers deviate from the actual numbers.

    1. Survey USA (10/30-11/1) – 58% / 18% (deviation 1.2%)

    2. VCU (10/21-25) – 54% / 18% (deviation 5.2%)

    3. (TIE) PPP (10/31-11/1) – 56% / 14% (deviation 6%)

    3. (TIE) Roanoke College (10/21-27) – 53% / 17% (deviation 6%)

    5. Suffolk Univ. (10/26-28) – 54% / 14% (deviation 8%)

    6. Rasmussen (10/27) – 54% / 13% (deviation 9%)

    7. Washington Post (10/22-25) – 55% / 11% (deviation 10%)

    8. Times Dispatch / Mason Dixon (10/28-29) – 53% / 12% (deviation 11%)

    9. Daily Kos / Research 2000 (10/26-28) – 54% / 10% (deviation 12%)

    10. Virginia Pilot / CNU (10/8-13) – 45% / 14% (deviation 17%)

    11. Clarus (10/18-19) – 49% / 8% (deviation 19%)


    Next time you see a poll, judge it by its past performance. Here is how they rank in terms of accuracy based upon the 2008 presidential election:

    MOST ACCURATE:

    1T. Rasmussen (11/1-3)**

    1T. Pew (10/29-11/1)**

    3. YouGov/Polimetrix (10/18-11/1)

    4. Harris Interactive (10/20-27)

    5. GWU (Lake/Tarrance) (11/2-3)*

    6T. Diageo/Hotline (10/31-11/2)*

    6T. ARG (10/25-27)*

    8T. CNN (10/30-11/1)

    8T. Ipsos/McClatchy (10/30-11/1)

    POLL REVEALED TO BE FRAUDULENT AND REPUDIATED BY DAILYKOS:

    10. DailyKos.com (D)/Research 2000 (11/1-3)

    ----------------

    (If you're below DailyKos, you don't deserve to be taken seriously for another four years. Better luck in 2012.)

    POLLS THAT WERE WORSE THAN A FRAUDULENT POLL:

    11. AP/Yahoo/KN (10/17-27)

    12. Democracy Corps (D) (10/30-11/2)

    13. FOX (11/1-2)

    14. Economist/YouGov (10/25-27)

    15. IBD/TIPP (11/1-3)

    16. NBC/WSJ (11/1-2)

    17. ABC/Post (10/30-11/2)

    18. Marist College (11/3)

    19. CBS (10/31-11/2)

    20. Gallup (10/31-11/2)

    21. Reuters/ C-SPAN/ Zogby (10/31-11/3)

    22. CBS/Times (10/25-29)

    23. Newsweak (10/22-23)

Is this any way to choose a Presidential Candidate?

I came across this interesting blog post about what happened recently in Virginia on our way to choosing republican candidates who will be permitted to appear on our ballots in the March primary. The author raises some very interesting questions about the most onerous state election procedure for access to a primary ballot.

First, the Virginia State board of elections issued four pages of instructions to candidates in May. Some candidates began collecting their petition signatures over the summer. Of course those candidates who had not yet decided to run could not begin in July, 8 months prior to the primary.

The Ashby Law Blog explains the whole process, and comments on it:

“Virginia’s statutory ballot access requirement is, quite simply, one of if not the most daunting in the country: A minimum of 10,000 petition signatures collected statewide, including at least 400 from each of its 11 congressional districts. That’s hard enough. But then there are the additional restrictions: The petition circulators must be registered or eligible to vote in Virginia. The signatures must be gathered using the State Board of Elections’ official form, a two-page document which must be reproduced as double-sided. (Single-sided stapled forms are not accepted.) Signatures must be collected on forms that are specific to each city, county and congressional district. Only “qualified” voters may sign a petition. And every single petition form must be sworn and notarized.

Want a sense of how next-to-impossible this is? I know top-flight Virginia political consultants who turned down lucrative petition project contracts from presidential campaigns because they did not think it could be done.” Ummmm……

On Tuesday, Romney was the first candidate to file his petitions with the state. Lt. Governor Bill Bolling personality delivered Romney’s 16,026 signatures to the state Board of Elections. The only other candidate to have over 15,000 signatures was Ron Paul.

Here’s the part that gives me most heartburn, from Pat Mullins, chairman of the RPV, “Any candidate who submits at least 15,000 signatures of registered voters on valid petitions
statewide and has at least 600 signatures of registered voters on valid petitions from each of the 11 Congressional Districts shall be deemed to have met the threshold for qualification and will be certified (provided, of course, that other requirements of State law have also been met).
If any candidate submits fewer than 15,000 signatures of registered voters on valid petitions statewide or fewer than 600 signatures of registered voters on valid petitions in one or more of the 11 Congressional Districts, the Republican Party of Virginia will individually verify signatures until the 10,000 signature statewide threshold and/or 400 per Congressional district is met.”

That means those candidates who submit half again as many signatures as required are held to a lower standard than those who submit over 10,000, but not all the way to 15,000. It means Romney and Paul had NO signatures verified, NONE. For all we know they could have submitted pages and pages of signatures of Mickey Mouse. Half of their signatures may have been invalid, we’ll never know. The other candidates had ALL of their signatures looked at by Republican volunteers. I have a real problem with this double standard for examining signatures on the petitions.

In addition to that, I learned today that each signature is verified by only one person, with very minimal instruction, just two days before Christmas. Republican volunteers work late into the night to verify signatures. Who knows how good their concentration was in the early morning hours of Christmas Eve. The republican volunteer goes through a petition and strikes whatever number of signatures they deem not to be valid. No one verifies what any volunteer has done with his/her stack of petitions. What happens if the volunteer supports a candidate other than the one on the petition they’re examining? Might that volunteer nitpick every page of signatures and throw out many more than necessary? No one would ever know because no one checks.

This whole procedure needs to be reworked. It’s too important to be done this way. The results of this procedure have left Virginia as an afterthought on Super Tuesday. It hurts the republican party because many fewer people will bother to vote in Virginia due the limited choices. A low turnout will hurt the party’s chances of identifying Virginia republican voters for the general election in November. Primaries are normally a great way to add to our republican lists, a great way to reach out to voters, but that won’t happen this year. If all these things weren’t enough of a problem for republicans, I’ve already heard democrats looking forward to voting for Ron Paul in the primary. They are rather happy with the limited choices on our ballot and are happy to crossover to vote for Paul, because they would love to see Ron Paul as our nominee. With only one other candidate on the ballot democrats think there’s a good chance for Paul to win.

The procedure needs to be changed, it’s not fair to our candidates or to our voters.

Merry Christmas to all and to all a Goodnight!

UPDATE: The Richmond Times-Dispatch weighs in.

Advertisement

11 Responses

  1. Newt is a crybaby, and could not make excuses for his lack of grass roots or organization. Mitt Romney is the only Republican conservative candidate who can defeat Obama. Pro life; pro free market; pro second amendment; pro “legal” immigration; and pro marriage… Go Mitt!

    • I will respectfully disagree with you about Mitt being a conservative. Conservatives don’t call themselves “progressives” not even ten years ago. Conservatives don’t call the flat tax “unfair” and a “tax cut for the rich” just four years ago.

  2. If one more person calls Romney a conservative, I’m going to scream. What a joke.

  3. This is all going to come down to representation at the National Convention. IIRC, the Delegates are given some latitude in cases where Ron “not-clear-on-the-concept” Paul should get ahead in the democrat-laced Primaries. I haven’t read any of the articles provided.
    It’s too close to Christmas to yank the wind outta my sails.
    Maybe I’ll read them in a couple of days.

  4. This means hat if we scrutinize Mitt Romney’s ballot access petitions, starting with the congressional district having the LEAST signatures, Mitt Romney probably did not qualify either. No one has checked. So if someone does the hard work of going through all of the petition signatures and checking validity, there may be NO ONE who qualified for the Virginia primary ballot. That would force a different nomination process.

  5. [...] not have actually qualified either.   But it appears we won’t even know that, if so.   Lovettsville Lady at Virginia Virtucon explained it really well: Here’s the part that gives me most heartburn, from Pat Mullins, chairman of the RPV, “Any [...]

  6. [...] Therefore, Virginia Virtucon asks Is this any way to choose a Presidential Candidate? [...]

  7. [...] Lovettsville Lady (Virginia Virtucon) (Also worth a read, the full text of Cuccinelli’s statement) [...]

  8. How difficult can this be? Kucinich managed to get on the ballot here in 2008.

  9. The part of this that really bugs me is this idea that candidates who turned in 15,000 signatures got a pass. In every campaign I have ever been involved in where petition signatures are required, each and every candidate’s petition signatures are verified. Once the count of verified signatures reaches the total number needed, the verification stops but EVERY candidate’s petitions are verified to insure that they have met the requirements.

    By declaring what amounts to “the lazy rule,” Pat Mullins has just invalidated our entire primary process. Anyone every heard of the 4th amendment? You know, that little thing called the Equal Protection Clause that states that everyone must be treated equally? The same Constitutional clause that was used by the US Supreme Court to stop the insanity that the Democrats were going to try to use in Florida in 2000 to steal the presidency from George W. Bush?

    By forcing Perry and Ginrich’s petitions to be scrutinized and validated, while not validating Romney or Paul’s, Pat Mullins has violated the Equal Protection Clause of the US Constitution.

    Nice goin’ guys, You have created a friggin’ mess that makes the Republican party look sooooo good just when we are coming up on a Presidential election that we can’t afford to lose if we ever want to repeal Obamacare and stop our Country from economic and financial collapse.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 47 other followers