Steve Chapman worries non-Repubicans might walk away from Republican Firehouse Primary on Saturday

This Saturday, Prince William County Republicans will choose their nominees in a series of firehouse primaries across the county. When they arrive, they’ll be asked to sign a statement of intent which simply says, “hey, you are choosing to participate in the Republican nominating process so it’d be nice if you’d pledge to support the actual Republican nominee come this November, whether or not it is your guy.” More or less.

To one candidate in particular, that is a bridge too far:

Steve Chapman, who is running for the Republican nominee for Woodbridge supervisor, said he’s concerned voters could be turned off by the “statement of intent.”

“It would be terrible for the party if a bunch of people come in and feel disenfranchised because they have to sign a blood oath to the Republican Party or be turned away,” Chapman said. “That’s un-American.”

“Un-American,” he says. Like a Constitutional right to free association granted to political parties not by a Supreme Court decision or the highest document in the land but by our Creator himself?

Or how about the well documented series of great “American” acts like adultery, threatening a 9 year old girl, and just being a jerk as documented regularly by BVBL?

Mr. Chapman, Steve if you will, Steve-o if I may, who exactly are you trying to get and come vote for you that would be offended to say they’ll support the Republican nominee in November even if it isn’t you?

Also, you do realize it’s non-binding, right? No pin prick, no knife and bowls, no ceremony of any sort, no one checking your ballot come November and hauling you off to a reeducation camp for voting the wrong way (Republicans don’t do that, Democrats do /snark).

Get over yourself, Steve-o. And be ready for the people of Woodbridge to elect Lee Price to be the Republican on the ballot in November – and the next Supervisor out of Woodbridge.

And I do hope you’ll vote for him in November, Steve-o.

Prince William County Fire House Primary – Saturday April 25

On Saturday April 25th voters from across the county in Prince William County will be going to the polls to set nominees for the Republican ticket for the fall elections.   In what is called a Fire House Primary voters will have  from 10am to 3pm to go to designated polling locations to vote for their choice to represent the Republican Party in the November election.

This year’s election in Prince William County is shaping up to be the most exciting election in Prince William County since 2003.  With an anti-incumbent sentiment growing in the county otherwise expected shoe-in incumbents are facing strong challenges for their party’s nomination.  For Chairman of the Board of County Supervisors Corey Stewart is facing a challenge from newcomer Chris Crawford and in the Coles District Marty Nohe is facing a challenge from Paul O’Meara.

Virginia Virtucon has been watching the races that are on the ballot Saturday and have made our endorsements.  Below find all of the candidates on the ballot and our label next to those we find to be the best choice for the future of Prince William County.

 

 

Race Candidate Candidate
Sheriff
11021530_1391559871164039_2734001692066890660_o Glen Hill
Facebookvvendorsedbadge
1284d7b Mike Messier
LinkedIn
Clerk of Court
52e203a3e9c98.image Michele McQuigg
Website
1234744_10151658168908269_128633255_n Austin Haynes
Websitevvendorsedbadge
BOCS Chairman
1234744_10151658168908269_128633255_n Corey Stewart
Facebook
crawford Chris Crawford
Websitevvendorsedbadge
Coles Supervisor
VOT_Martin_E_Marty_Nohe_8057_1317409020 Marty Nohe
Website
O'Meara169 Paul O’Meara
Websitevvendorsedbadge
Occoquan Supervisor
Anderson_Headshot (2) Ruth Anderson
Websitevvendorsedbadge
11156253_444984835675392_4506503143123809939_n Donald Scroggins
Facebook
Woodbridge Supervisor
1234744_10151658168908269_128633255_n1 Lee Price
Websitevvendorsedbadge
s6-2-257x300 Steve Chapman
Website

Tell Us what you think about the races in PWC – who would you vote for?

Schoeneman responds to the barrage against him

 

1234744_10151658168908269_128633255_n

Brian Schoeneman candidate for the nomination for the Republicans in Fairfax County’s Sully District has been catching it pretty bad on the interwebs lately.  Everything including the kitchen sink has been thrown at him as of late.. on all social media, and frankly it’s getting on the nerves of many who are not in Fairfax or in the Sully District, that being said Brian took to social media this morning to respond :

Throughout this campaign, I have focused on voter contact. My team and I have been working tirelessly, every day, knocking doors, calling voters, sending emails and getting my positive message out on who I am, what I have done, and what I want to do as your Sully Supervisor.

We are down to the last week. In the last week, the attacks against me have ramped up, whether they be via emails, blog posts or direct mail, authorized or not by my opponents. This is unfortunate, but I refuse to respond in kind. My opponents are both good men, and I won’t level the kinds of attacks against them that have been leveled against me. That kind of politics of personal destruction is what is killing our representative form of government, and I refuse to play that game.

Voters don’t want to see attacks like this, and rightfully so. That’s why my campaign is going to keep doing what we are doing, talking to voters everyday and earning votes, not tearing people down.

I for one will be happy when this particular primary is done, so we can get to the business of getting our candidates elected.  The pleasure that some take in tearing down folks, i hope is translated into the general election in November, then we can start getting folks elected again.

Full disclosure the author has publicly supported Brian Schoeneman, but this post is not an endorsement, or does it reflect the views of the blog as a whole

Ruth Anderson the right woman for the job in Occoquan

Anderson_Headshot (2)

 

Air Force Veteran (20 years), Community Activist, Dedicated Wife and Mother; Republicans rejoiced when Ruth Anderson decided to jump into the race for Occoquan Supervisor. Ruth faces Don Scoggins for the Republican nomination on April 25th.

Ruth has been someone I have known since I began my sentence in the political arena many years ago, and she is one of the most dedicated of all the people that I know. She will make an awesome Supervisor not only in representing her district but Prince William County as a whole.

The quote on her website represents not only the Republican Party, but what the folks of Prince William County need,” As County Supervisor, my priority will be to protect taxpayers. I believe the people make better choices with their hard-earned money than the government does.”

I encourage my friends and all Republicans to vote for Ruth on April 25th

 

This post reflects only the view of the blogger 

 

 

Follow-up On Slating… And A Word About The Sully Mess

A little over a week ago, I wrote here about the slating affair of last year and what its lasting consequences have been, are, and should be. A few days later, I got an email from Delegate Jimmie Massie (R-72nd) expressing his concerns that he was being unfairly named as one of the slaters. He copied the illustrious T. Boulden on it, asking me to retract that part of my post. So I again reached out to some Henrico activist folks I know that were at the Henrico mass meeting. What I got back was interesting.

Delegate John O’Bannon (R-73rd) actually taunted someone before the meeting, sticking his finger in the guy’s face, saying “When your side starts winning elections, then we can sit down and talk.”

Whoops. How’d that work out for you? See you in 2017.

Both O’Bannon and Linwood Cobb clearly were in on the slating, and Janis was seen whispering with Cobb at the back of the room. And… “Massie addressed the audience before the voting began to prepare our side for losing. He said we had to ‘leave there and stay friends after the vote.’ After the vote, I went up to Jimmie and asked him if we were still friends?”

Also, these letters went out shortly before the Henrico County mass meeting (editorializing and highlighting not mine, this is the state in which I got them):

O'Bannon-MassieHenricoLetters

Remarkably like some emails that went out in Hampton Roads before the meetings down there, which were courtesy of Ray Allen and the YG Virginia crowd, aren’t they? Bearing in mind as well that O’Bannon was obviously involved in the planning and execution of the Henrico slating effort, it certainly doesn’t look good to be coordinating with him.

To sum up, I stand by my previous post.

Moving on to the Sully Supervisor primary, I just want to state that while I’m personally a firm supporter of John Guevara in that race, the attack on Brian Schoeneman yesterday was ridiculous. He went to his personal network, as every smart candidate does, to raise money. Not a thing wrong with that.

 

Frank Principi wants to continue his vision for Woodbridge………

1234744_10151658168908269_128633255_n

Though he has not ramped up his fundraising yet, Democrat and frequent neglecter of the Woodbridge District Frank Principi made it official he wants another term. Speaking to POTOMAC LOCAL he says he plans to run on his past record as Supervisor, stating:

“I’m running on my record. My record of not just the vision of a new Woodbridge, but the fact that we’ve got a billion dollars in public and private investment over the last four years in Woodbridge. I think we have a lot to be proud of”

I am not sure where in Woodbridge he is talking about, but he is proud of his record and he wants to continue the work he is doing here….Maybe it’s the rundown strip malls, or the various cash checking places up and down route 1 that he is proud of? Perhaps it’s the crime and gang issues we deal with and overcrowding schools and failing infrastructure that can be found throughout the neighborhoods of Woodbridge…but if he is proud then he is proud.

 

We have two challengers vying for the Republican nomination here in Woodbridge, Steve Chapman and Lee Price. Whoever wins the nomination on April 25th will have their work cut out for them , the Democratic machine will be out in full force for Principi and when he starts fundraising and using money to cover his failings as Supervisor, it will be a huge battle.

Virginia Republicans vote to get rid of the death tax…all except Rigell

 

1234744_10151658168908269_128633255_n

In a vote of 240-179, the House Republicans voted to repeal the Death tax today. Proudly the entire  Virginia Republican delegation voted for repeal, except Congressman Scott Rigell.  In his press release, the Congressman explains his vote and I will leave it to the reader to agree or disagree with his reasoning:

“Today I voted against cutting the estate tax to zero. As our military absorbs the impacts of sequestration, I cannot justify supporting a bill that adds nearly $270 billion to the debt without providing an offset for these costs.

“Members of Congress hold different views on this, and I understand why many of my colleagues cast a principled vote in support of this bill. However, Congress and the White House have already made significant progress in this area. Legislation signed into law in 2013 allows an individual to pass on $5.4 million without paying an estate tax. A couple can pass on $10.8 million. The bill we voted on today would only affect an estimated two-tenths of one percent of Americans or about 5,500 households.

“Our nation’s financial problems are very serious and if not addressed, threaten the future of every American regardless of age, gender, ethnicity or political affiliation.

“We know with certainty that there will be a 33% increase in the number of seniors enrolling in Medicare and Social Security over the next ten years. Additionally, defense spending cuts driven by sequestration threaten our national security and reduce investments in other critical areas including transportation.

“My focus is on reversing sequestration, protecting our military, and putting our nation on a better fiscal path. I will continue to fight for sound financial policy driven by facts and an unapologetic resolve to pass on to the next generation of Americans the blessings of liberty and freedom.” – Congressman Scott Rigell

###

With that being said Barbara Comstock voted with the majority of the GOP and the Virginia Delegation and voted against this invasive tax. Her statement is as follows:

“Imagine building up a family business or family farm your whole life only to lose much of that business upon the death of Mom or Dad.  Under current law, Uncle Sam swoops in and can take up to 40% of what you spent a lifetime building up for your children and grandchildren.  Today we voted to stop that injustice.

 

“Family businesses are the backbone of the American economy and should not be punished for saving responsibly and investing in our country.  This legislation provides hardworking families and small businesses with the economic security they need to create jobs and grow our economy.  No longer will families be forced to sell parts of their farms and small businesses in order to pay an unfair tax to the government due to the death of a loved one.

 

“The Death Tax is double taxation on income already earned and taxed as well as an undue burden on American families.  With passage of this legislation, those who own family farms and small businesses will be able to plan ahead for their future and pass along their hard earned businesses to their children and grandchildren.” – Barbara Comstock

 

This Blogger agrees with Comstocks explanation, I’m curious to what others may be thinking. 

 

 

 

 

Austin Haynes one of the good guys

1234744_10151658168908269_128633255_n

 

I usually shy away from making public endorsements, but in the case of the Prince William County Clerk of the Court race I think it needs to be done and said.

Austin Haynes is weathering a barrage of attacks from his career politician opponent. And while his opponent spends thousands of dollars and time running a gutter campaign, Austin has emerged as the good person – and the right person – to be the next Clerk of the Court. Austin has been doing all the right things in this primary, and no matter what the outcome he will emerge from this race as the better person.

Unlike the current Clerk of the Court, Austin has vowed not to use the office as his own political bully pulpit and has pledged to update the office into the 21st century. Austin brings a level head, a good attitude, and the right ideas to an office that has lacked all three qualities as of late.

The tactics that are being used against Austin are disgusting and unfair and these scorched earth efforts will come back to haunt those using them. We have an opportunity to reject this style of politics and elect a great Clerk of the Court. Vote Austin Haynes in the April 25thFirehouse Primary.

 

This post reflects the views of the author

Democrats struggle to play catch up in the 29th Senate District.

1654245_10152801195511197_5145077560438619711_n

 

Well, the numbers are out for the three Dems vying for the nomination in the 29th District.

McPike at $50,220; Qarni $35,778, Futrell at $31,716.

The problem for them is, with their combined total, they are way out of reach of Hal Parrish:

 

For Immediate Release                                                                                                   

April 14, 2015

 

Parrish Campaign Announces Record

$330,000 Fundraising Quarter

 

Builds a Broad Coalition of Virginians For Servant Leadership

 

Manassas, Virginia — Hal Parrish, candidate for the Virginia State Senate in the 29th District, raised a record $330,000 since announcing his candidacy in late January. The campaign’s first quarter fundraising total represents the most raised in any single quarter by any candidate in the 29th District and places the Parrish campaign in the top tier of Virginia Senate races this cycle.

“A campaign is only as strong as the people in it, and I am humbled and grateful to the hundreds of supporters here in Manassas, Prince William, and across Virginia who support our message of servant leadership,” said Parrish.

“There is a legacy of servant legislators that have come before me that have put the needs of their constituents and districts before politics and before themselves. I believe in that tradition and so does our growing coalition of supporters. Our campaign will work to provide Virginia families common sense ideas to improve the quality of our life and our infrastructure, create better jobs, and better fund our schools.”

Highlights of Parrish’s first fundraising quarter:

 

Total Individual Donors: 400

Total Contributions of $100 or Less: 212

 

###

Net Neutrality: Congress Need Legislate, the FCC Not Regulate, the Internet

530915_10151247519484380_2072272125_n

 

As former 9th District Congressman Rick Boucher so informatively points out in a recent column that he wrote for the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, Virginia is at the core of the net neutrality debate;

“Virginia and Virginian’s have a special role in the history of the Internet and a special concern for its flourishing. You can have a “Virginia Internet C@pital” license plate on your car; last year, the Washington Post suggested that Ashburn, VA was “the center of the Internet”, with 70% of the world’s Internet data passing through it and 5,000,000 square feet of data centers in Loudoun County alone. Silicon Valley may be more famous, but without Virginia, the backbone of the Internet would simply not exist.”

And as is the norm, Congress is a day late and a trillion short getting down to business, as its just now beginning to seriously debate several bills from both political parties in both Chambers regarding what to do with the FCC’s already month-old ruling on net neutrality.

The GOP would like to limit, not abolish, the authority of the FCC to oversee the internet after its ruling classifying the net as a more highly regulated utility-like service under “Title II” of the Communications Act.

Dems on the SAME hand, are also open to language that too would limit the FCC’s powers in fear that the FCC’s new regs could be overturned by either the federal courts or a future GOP-led FCC.

A reversal of the Title II designation, with the FCC still maintaining some level of oversight over the internet, seems like a possible bi-partisan solution. So what’s the hold up?

The answer to that question is Congress itself.  With a backlog of major issues that seem to come and go with a whole lot of debate and very little legislative action, will Congress even act at all on net neutrality?

 

Hugo continues his fight against Human Trafficking

530915_10151247519484380_2072272125_n
Two of my favorite Virginia legislators continue the fight against the awful realities of Human Trafficking
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
HUGO AND OBENSHAIN HOLD PRESS CONFERENCE ON SIGNIFICANT HUMAN TRAFFICKING LEGISLATION
Richmond, VA – (April 15, 2015) Today, Delegate Tim Hugo (R-40) and Senator Mark Obenshain (R-26) held a press conference to highlight HB1964 and SB1188, which together have been signed into law by the Governor. These bills create Virginia’s first standalone statute for sex trafficking.
Delegate Hugo stated:
“I would like to thank the Kids Are Not For Sale Coalition for their tremendous help with this legislation and their efforts to raise awareness of this horrendous crime. I would like to thank Senator Obenshain, as well as Delegates Rob Bell and Todd Gilbert, for their dedication and assistance in crafting House Bill 1964 and Senate Bill 1188. The threat of sex trafficking is far closer to home than many realize, and in the General Assembly, we are committed to eradicating this crime against our young people.  This stand-alone statute will send traffickers and buyers the message that they are not welcome here; and that our kids are not for sale in Virginia. Not now, and not ever.”
Virginia is now the final state in the United States to enact a standalone human trafficking law. The passage of HB1964 and its subsequent signature into law by the Governor marks another goal reached for Virginia’s many organizations and individuals dedicated to stopping human trafficking. In 2011, Shared Hope International, an anti-sex trafficking organization that annually grades every state on its laws combatting child sex trafficking, gave Virginia, along with 25 other states, an “F” grade. While Virginia has made significant improvements since then to its laws combatting sex trafficking, raising its grade in 2013, Virginia’s progress continued to stall without a specific sex trafficking law. Legislators this session made sure that this gap in Virginia’s laws will no longer hold back the Commonwealth from stamping out this egregious crime.
HB1964 sets apart the offense of sex trafficking as a distinct crime and specifically criminalizes sex trafficking of a minor. Perpetrators now face a class 3 felony when a minor is the victim of sex trafficking, regardless of whether the child was forced, intimidated or deceived, reflecting the realities of how these criminals prey on the vulnerability and trust of their victims. The new law criminalizes the recruitment of minors and adults for commercial sex, conduct that had not been prohibited under Virginia law unless the defendant was a gang member. This law will also provide legal tools such as multijurisdictional grand juries, the option to seize the assets of suspected traffickers, and sex offender registration requirements that put the community on notice of the threat posed by convicted sex traffickers.
This will be the fourth piece of legislation in five years introduced by Delegate Hugo aimed at human trafficking. HB1898, introduced by Delegate Hugo in 2011 and passed into law, made abduction for the purposes of child prostitution a felony. HB1606, which became law in 2013, increased the punishment for those soliciting minors for prostitution. Most recently in 2014, the General Assembly passed Hugo’s HB485, which empowers law enforcement to better track down and arrest suspected traffickers.
###
As the third ranking member in the Virginia House of Delegates leadership, Delegate Hugo currently serves as the Majority Caucus Chairman for the House Republican Caucus. He is the Vice Chairman of the Finance Committee and also serves on the Commerce and Labor, Transportation, and Privileges and Election Committees. Delegate Hugo represents Centreville, Clifton, Fairfax, and Fairfax Station in Fairfax County as well as Catharpin, Gainesville, Haymarket, and Manassas in Prince William County.

 

Ron Meyer flexes fundraising muscle

Millennial Supervisor Candidate Ron Meyer has flexed his fundraising muscle in his quest to be the next Supervisor of the Broad Run District in Loudoun County. Here is the Press Release from his campaign :

 

images

 

Ron Meyer Raises More Than $33,500 in Bid for Broad Run Supervisor

Ashburn, VA – Ron Meyer, President of Springboard Media Strategies and candidate for Broad Run Supervisor, announced he will report more than $33,500 in contributions for the quarter that ended on March 31, 2015—just a month and a half after launching his bid.

 

The campaign will report more than $29,900 cash on hand, and 97% of the contributors to the campaign are from Northern Virginia. These figures demonstrate that Meyer’s campaign is off to a strong start and that many in the local grassroots and business communities are willing to significantly invest in his campaign.

 

Meyer released the following statement:

 

The only way to keep taxes low and continue investing in modern schools and transportation is to attract businesses to Loudoun—especially to our tax districts along the coming Silver Line and Route 28. 

 

Our strong financial support shows we have significant trust from the business community and local families. They are excited about our plans to improve Broad Run’s economy by modernizing our education system, expanding our transportation options, and utilizing Metro for economic development.  

 

Our 21st century ideas include facilitating the building of a tech-focused campus on the Silver Line, continuing investment in STEM education for Loudoun teens, and encouraging the construction of technology infrastructure in new commercial developments.  

 

###

The JMU College Republicans Threw a Party

This article was posted on “The Breeze” JMU’s Online News Magazine this morning. Author Chris Kent

1234744_10151658168908269_128633255_n

 

College Republicans advocating a change

JMU College Republicans, an organization committed to promoting conservative ideals on campus, hosted its first Spring Banquet last Thursday. The meeting included both Republican representatives and JMU students.

Noteworthy attendees included former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va), Virginia Delegate and JMU business law professor Ben Cline and political science professor Pete Giesen.

Giesen received the first Pete Giesen award at the banquet. Named after him, it honors political service to the state of Virginia and continuing efforts to educate and involve students in state politics. Giesen’s political career started in 1964 when he was elected Virginia Delegate to the 25th district and continued until his retirement in 1996 when he was State House Representative.

Gilmore and Goodlatte gave the keynote speeches at the event, eliciting standing ovations from the audience.

Gilmore, who was in charge of the commonwealth as governor from 1998 to 2002, spoke at the end of the dinner, touching on what he considers to be the problems America faces today. Gilmore listed the nation’s fluctuating economy as the greatest concern, followed by the current foreign relation policies. He believes the lack of quality, high- paying jobs available to college graduates across America has contributed to inadequate job growth.

“When a person comes out of college they ought to have an opportunity to have a selection of jobs that will give them a decent career,” Gilmore said. “Forty-seven percent of college graduates in America today end up working in jobs that do not require a bachelor’s degree and that is because we do not have good enough career paths in the United States. We have inadequate job growth.”

Gilmore believes the tax cuts and special interest loopholes in national policies have stifled the job market and economy in America. He would rather see tax cuts across the board, not just for special interest groups or companies, and he would like to see the loopholes in tax laws closed, hoping this will encourage investment and economic growth.

“I think it is a deliberate policy to have slow growth in this country,” Gilmore said. “I think it is because we keep raising taxes on investments. When you raise taxes on investments, you get less investments, and when you get less investments you get fewer and less jobs.”

Gilmore was approached with questions, asking if he was seeking the Republican nomination for president in 2016. While he didn’t officially give the intentions on doing so, he laughed, saying he was thinking about it. He mentioned the bad taste the current administration left in his mouth regarding Barack Obama’s policy on pulling out the U.S military from nations and the semi-isolationism this creates.

However, on the opposite side, Gilmore doesn’t favor the neo-conservative policy of using military first and then questioning later, which Obama’s predecessors, like George W. Bush, promoted. Neo-conservativism includes those who promote American interests abroad and are characterized by their use of military force.

Christian Heiens, a junior political science major and College Republican, was surprised by Gilmore’s comments on foreign policy.

“I think it is interesting that he is understanding that younger Republicans are more in tune to the Rand Paul message, so especially talking to a bunch of college Republicans, I think he is trying to reach out to us, but I think he is genuine about it,” Heiens said. “He is understanding it is not just isolationism versus invading every country in the world. The United States as a leader in foreign policy has to be able to do everything.”

Gilmore ended his remarks by saying that he thinks the people of Virginia are suffering under the current administration, and the closing speech by Goodlatte championed this belief. Goodlatte left the event before he was able to be approached for comments, although his closing speech summarized that problems faced by normal Americans today are due in great part to the belief that the government can solve anything. Goodlatte added that changes needed to be made to welfare and retirement entitlements.

The event even attracted Virginia Delegate Ben Cline. Both left encouraged by the turnout and cohesiveness of the young Republicans present. Cline said he was thankful for the event, especially for the work done by JMU College Republicans to recruit new members. JMU is in what Cline regards as the Commonwealth’s breadbasket of Republican voters and encourages the JMU College Republicans continuing volunteer efforts.

“I have noticed an enthusiasm by students to get involved, to give back to their communities and to their commonwealth,” Cline said. “JMU republicans, JMU students in general, are very aware of the world around them. They want to be involved, they want to contribute to the betterment of their world. And those with Republican leanings have really helped out the cause statewide, and nationally, by getting involved here at the JMU CR. So, power to them.”

contact Chris Kent at kent2cm@dukes.jmu.edu

Money Bomb for John Guevara!

Folks, the Establishment is at it again.

Ignoring the wishes of Republicans in Sully, trying to anoint a nominee from outside the district, trying to exclude Hispanics and conservatives from the party — the Establishment has made one thing clear: they want power in Fairfax.

John Guevara is here to send them a message: No anointed candidates. No buying elections.

A 15-year resident of Sully, John is an all-American story: Boy Scouts, military service, active in his church, active in the community, and a hardworking American.

John Guevara is everything that is RIGHT about America and we would be lucky to have a true conservative nominee like him here in Sully. But don’t tell that to the Fairfax Establishment; they are dead set on anointing their own tax-hiking, union-shill, conservative-hating candidate.

Don’t let the Establishment drown out your voice in this important election!

Help John defeat the Establishment by giving John the help he needs to get his message out. Just $50 can help John turn the tide in Fairfax, and send them a message:

Our representatives should be elected by the people; not the political establishment.

Help push a real conservative leader over the top in Fairfax. Help John today!

Note: this post constitutes the views of the author and does not constitute an endorsement by Virginia Virtucon.

Democrats and the War On Women

Virginia Democrats seem to be carrying their war on underage women outside of the womb.

First there was the Joe Morrissey sex scandal where he reportedly impregnated an underage intern at his law office.

Now there’s the story of 21 year old Tyler Martin of Richmond who served at a tracker for the Virginia Senate Democratic Caucus in the General Assembly:

According to a source connected to the Virginia Senate Republican Caucus, Martin had been the Democratic Party’s tracker for Republican Senators during this year’s legislative session, assigned to follow and video record them at every opportunity.

The Democrat staffer, according to NBC12, traveled to Spotsylvania with three friends in the hopes of consummating a liaison with an underage girl who, as it turns out, happened to be a Spotsylvania detective. [UPDATE: A former prosecutor with knowledge of the matter has contacted TBE to let us know that the “girl” in question was thought by Mr. Martin and his cohorts to be all of 12 years of age.]

The Caucus is trying to push off of Mr. Martin and his role:

“He served as an unpaid legislative session volunteer for the Senate Democratic Caucus for several weeks monitoring public General Assembly committee meetings and assisting with administrative duties. We have had no contact with him since his arrest, but remain shocked and disappointed at the circumstances.”

While this may be all well and good, the entire story feeds back into the recent arguments by the left as summed up by Bearing Drift:

Of course, in recent months folks have been treated to a barrage of “pedophilia is a disorder, not a crime” nonsense. One should consider that it is both, and that preying upon children for sexual gratification — or the variant of pederasty with physically mature yet mentally immature teenagers — leaves decades of lasting harm to victims and enables perpetrators.

Hats off to Spotsylvania’s Internet Crimes Against Children unit. This is low work that cannot be comfortable for law enforcement… but proactively tackling it at this level where the perpetrators walk in with intent to harm? Might save the next girl.

So now we have TWO recent cases of Virginia Democrats preying upon underage women. Stack this up next to yesterday’s brilliant move by Rand Paul to put the DNC on the spot and you get a view into the real war on women:

“Here’s an answer,” said Schultz, a representative from Florida. “I support letting women and their doctors make this decision without government getting involved. Period. End of story. Now your turn, Senator Paul. We know you want to allow government officials like yourself to make this decision for women — but do you stand by your opposition to any exceptions, even when it comes to rape, incest, or life of the mother? Or do we just have different definitions of ‘personal liberty’?

“And I’d appreciate it if you could respond without ‘shushing’ me,” she added, a reference to Paul’s past encounters with reporters.

The Kentucky Republican obliged in an appearance on CNN late Wednesday afternoon but said Wasserman Schultz has “got some explaining to do.”

“It sounds like her answer is yes, that she’s OK with killing a 7-pound baby,” Paul said.

“Debbie’s position, which I guess is the Democratic Party’s position, that an abortion all the way up until the day of birth would be fine, I really think most pro-choice people would be uncomfortable with that,” he continued.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/rand-paul-battles-debbie-wasserman-schultz-on-abortion-116782.html#ixzz3WpZs9PJz

Op-Ed: Delegate Rob Bell and the Tebow Bill

1654245_10152801195511197_5145077560438619711_n

 

If your homeschooler is an athlete, what should you do when he reaches high school age?  In many communities and for many sports, the only truly competitive athletics are those offered through the local high school.  Should you focus on what’s best for his academics, and homeschool him?  Or should you let him pursue his athletic dreams (and college scholarships) by enrolling in high school?

More importantly, why is Virginia forcing parents to make this difficult choice?

In 29 states, homeschoolers can participate in interschool competition – like sports, debate, and band – through their local high schools.  In Virginia, homeschoolers can participate through the 8th grade and can engage in extracurriculars and classes at their local high school.  However, they are banned from interschool competitions by the Virginia High School League.

The Tebow Bill, HB 1626, would change this.

To be eligible, HB 1626 requires a homeschooler to be an amateur, be under the age of 19, and be compliant with all team rules.  Pursuant to the homeschooling statute, the homeschooler must demonstrate evidence of academic progress for two years, which includes standardized testing or an annual review by the school system.  (This two-year requirement is to ensure that a failing public school student would not be able to use supposed homeschooling as a convenient way to keep playing sports.)  Last, HB 1626 makes eligibility a local option, meaning that each school board can make its own decision about whether to allow homeschoolers to participate.

The measure has been ferociously opposed by the VEA and school administrators, and Governor Mcauliffe has vetoed it. The General Assembly will attempt to override the veto on April 15.

My mother was a pioneer homeschooler who testified in Richmond in favor of Virginia’s original home schooling law.  From these modest beginnings, homeschooling is now a mainstream educational choice for more than 30,000 Virginian students. For some teenagers, homeschooling is a perfect academic fit.  No parent should be forced to choose between his child’s academics and athletics, at least not where the rules can be written to allow students to have both.  More than half the states allow this, and Virginia should do so as well.

 

 Republican Delegate Rob Bell Represents Virginia’s 58th District in the House of Delegates

Corey Stewart Highlights Editorial Endorsement That Should Drive Conservatives Away From Him

From Facebook:

coreySince 2006, we’ve watched with growing admiration (and sometimes shock) as the former die-hard has moved from naysayer to pragmatist.

. . .

He’s shown a willingness to bend, to grow and to improvise

Those words alone, which Stewart wholeheartedly embraces on his own campaign website, are the very reasons why Corey needs to go after 9 years as County Board Chairman. Whenever a publication that tends to disagree with you says that you have “grown,” watch out. He is too willing to “bend,” too willing to “improvise” and too willing to go along to get along. That has resulted in increased spending on non-core functions of government and increased tax burdens on families. Our schools are more crowded and our streets are more congested than when he took office. Our commercial tax base is still anemic at best (and that is only propped up by counting apartment complexes as commercial and not residential.)

Prince William Times is wrong. Our county needs new leadership who is willing to stand on principle to redirect spending from luxuries to necessities so we have the necessary resources to reduce class sizes, increase teacher pay and hold the line on families’ tax burdens.

That person is Chris Crawford and that is why Virginia Virtucon has endorsed him in the April 25 Republican firehouse primary.

A year later… “Get over it.” Not a CHANCE.

So it appears that many Republican members of the General Assembly that supported the Cantor/Young Guns-led slating effort at county conventions last year will be unopposed for nomination this year. More’s the pity. These are the very people who need to be held responsible… and when I say ‘held responsible’, I mean ‘defeated and sent home’. It’s been roughly a year since that (thankfully largely unsuccessful) effort went down, and somehow Frank Wagner and Scott Taylor, the most odious of this bunch, have escaped primary challenges. It seems the entire Hampton Roads/TowneBank mafia/delegation was involved. The only good news is that Sen. Jeff McWaters (R-8th) is retiring, but his buddy, and fellow slater, Del. Bill DeSteph, is all set up with McWaters’ support for the nomination.
However, this is one place where there is an opportunity to hold a slater accountable in a primary. DeSteph is opposed by Craig Hudgins, a former Marine and grassroots conservative, with the support of local tea party activists. I encourage every Republican to do whatever they can to support Mr. Hudgins.
Another opportunity is in the 12th Senate District, which is also an open seat. The establishment-backed candidate is former Delegate Bill Janis, who supported slating. Siobhan Stolle Dunnavant is also running… yes, she’s another member of the slatin’ Stolle dynasty from Hampton Roads, and as such, is to be opposed. From what I’ve heard from locals, she’s not particularly impressive. Thankfully, there is also Vince Haley, a tea party backed conservative who has the personal support of Newt Gingrich, which has helped him raise quite a few dollars. He’s also brought aboard Zach Werrell, the young campaign manager of Dave Brat’s primary upset of slater-in-chief Eric Cantor last year. Just as with Mr. Hudgins, it’s vital to support Mr. Haley in this primary.
As to the other slaters who will coast to nomination unopposed, it would seem an opportunity has been lost this year. This includes Wagner, Taylor, all the Stolles currently in office, Barry Knight, Jimmie Massie, and DeSteph’s minion Jason Miyares, who was parachuted in to fill DeSteph’s current House seat, and no doubt quite a few others. The grassroots will just have to wait until 2017 (or 2019, in the case of Senators) to challenge them. There’s always the general election, and the possibility of their defeat there. You might well think I’d support that, but as a Republican, I couldn’t possibly comment.
The common refrain from the slaters and their supporters in response to this is some version of “Get over it. It happened.” This is patently ridiculous. As a certain former RPV chairman once told me, it’s not often that people show you who they really are in politics. The slating effort was one such moment, and it was very illuminating, and not something these people can paper over or take back. “Whoops, sorry” isn’t going to do it. Their arrogance and entitlement shows how little respect they have for those they claim to represent.
Our outstanding current state chairman, John Whitbeck, is focused on uniting the party behind conservative principles, and is working hard to right the ship across the board. I know this is the last thing he needs, but from the perspective of the grassroots, this has to take precedence. Never forget.

Judge Dismisses Incumbent Protection Act Suit

In a blow to conservatives seeking to reclaim the Republican Party’s role in nominating its candidates, Judge Elizabeth Dillon in federal court in Harrisonburg today dismissed the complaints of both the Party and an affected challenger to incumbent Sen. Emmett Hanger (R-Augusta).

For a quick primer on the Incumbent Protection Act and the basis of the controversy, please check here and here. In a nutshell, Virginia’s Incumbent Protection Act gives incumbent members of the General Assembly the exclusive right to pick the method by which they can be re-nominated by their party, regardless of the preferences of the party. Incumbents naturally choose state-run open primaries, which give them the greatest possible advantage over challengers when compared to the party-run alternatives (mass meetings/caucuses, cavnasses/firehouse primaries, or conventions). Incumbents have the advantage of name recognition and the ability to tap vast funding from their respective House and Senate party caucuses.

Because these state-run open primaries in Virginia mean that members of other political parties can participate in the nomination of Republican candidates, the Republican legislative district committee for the 24th Senate District, where Emmett Hanger (R-Augusta) is the incumbent, sued the State Board of Elections to halt the primary that Hanger chose, in favor of the convention the party committee chose.

The 24th LDC’s principal argument was that forcing the party to hold a process that allows non-members to participate violates their First Amendment freedoms of association and speech, and that therefore Virginia’s Incumbent Protection Act should be declared unconstitutional. As we wrote here, after the LDC and its chairman Ken Adams filed their suit, a challenger for the nomination, Dan Moxley, filed a motion to intervene as a plaintiff. Moxley’s principal argument is that the Incumbent Protection Act represents a Constitutional equal protection violation, in that it gives an incumbent unique advantages over all other candidates.

Since Moxley’s move to join the suit, the defendant State Board of Elections has filed its reply, along with a motion to dismiss. Additionally, Senator Hanger has moved to intervene, arguing that he has interests that the State Board cannot adequately represent. The gist of the defendants’ arguments was that the state has an interest in promoting primaries that justifies what would otherwise be deemed Constitutional infirmities in the Incumbent Protection Act. These were pretty weak arguments given that the Act allows the incumbent to choose any method of nomination that suits him or her, not just a primary, and even then these arguments don’t address the unfair advantage incumbents are given in being able to make that choice regardless of what other voters in the district (i.e., the Party) believe.

Unfortunately for the 24th District Committee and Dan Moxley, defendants also made another basic argument that the judge determined to have more merit. This involved the portion of the Republican Party Plan of Organization that allows for a Legislative District Committee to determine a method of nomination only “where permitted to do so by Virginia law.” Rather than allow plaintiffs’ challenge to proceed on the basis that the law’s injury exists with or without the Party rules and/or that the provision does not preclude challenging unconstitutional law, the judge instead found that the existence of that language in the Plan constituted the Party’s voluntary acquiescence to the Incumbent Protection Act. Hence, reasoned Judge Dillon:

The Party’s voluntary decision to limit the authority of the LDC in its Plan and to allow the incumbent to decide upon the method of selecting a nominee is a decision the Party is permitted to make and is the cause of any alleged injury to the plaintiffs. For these same reasons, this court cannot redress any injury caused by the Party’s governing Plan. Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to establish standing

It is unclear at this point whether the plaintiffs are contemplating an appeal. We’ll keep you posted.

Judge Dillon’s full ruling is embedded below.

Cross-posted at The Bull Elephant.

Incumbent Protection Act Dismissal

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/260720141/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&show_recommendations=true

Pete Candland Endorses Lee Price for Woodbridge Supervisor

6a00d8341cca7b53ef00e55509ba068834

Ever popular Prince William County Supervisor Pete Candland gave his stamp of approval for Lee Price ,who is in the running for the Republican nomination for Woodbridge supervisor.

         Over the last few months, I’ve had the opportunity to get to know Lee Price who is running for Woodbridge Supervisor on the Prince William Board of County                            Supervisors. I have been extremely impressed by his vision for Woodbridge and his desire to make sure each tax dollar is  spent wisely. Lee would be a tremendous                addition to the Board.- Pete Candland

Lee Price faces Steve Chapman in a firehouse primary on April 25th.