General Petraeus testifies that CIA Benghazi memo was later altered. Benghazi Story Changed!

UPDATE:  According to Senator Saxby Chambliss, Susan Rice knew she was lying to the American people about who was responsible for the Benghazi attacks.  “Chambliss said Rice “went beyond” the talking points. “She even mentioned that under the leadership of Barack Obama we had decimated al Qaeda. Well, she knew at that time that al Qaeda was very likely responsible in part or in whole for the death of Ambassador Stevens,” he said.”   So who told her to lie?  Who changed the CIA memo sent by Petraeus’ office?  Story here.   Charles Krauthammer was right.  Petraeus went along with the administration’s story in an effort to save his job and reputation.  After the election, and after the administration had disposed of him, he’s now telling the truth about Benghazi.

In private hearings today before House and Senate Intelligence Committees, General David Petraeus testified that the CIA knew almost immediately that the attacks on our embassy in Benghazi were the results of a terrorism.   The CIA memo was later stripped of any reference to “Al Quada involvement”.   It has not been determined who changed the CIA talking points and who was responsible for sending UN Ambassador Susan Rice to the Sunday news programs to tell a different story than the one Petraeus claims to have presented previously to Congress, that the attack on 9/11 was a pre-planned result of Al Quada terrorism and not a spontaneous uprising because of a film trailer.

More here and here.


7 thoughts on “General Petraeus testifies that CIA Benghazi memo was later altered. Benghazi Story Changed!

  1. Well gee, now I guess Obama will have to forgive Senator McCain for “besmirching” Rice’s reputation. Meet the new boss same as the old boss. Don’t get fooled again.

    1. And now I’ve heard that out of the 20 or 30 thousand emails sent by Gen. Allen, only two emails out of the pile are “questionable.” That’s after they besmirched his reputation as well.

      Petreaus admitted to the affair with Broadwell, but the left set out to make that the most important story, and successfully took the focus off the Benghazi massacre. It was sad to see so many on our side unwittingly participating in the leftists Alinsky tactics. I want to know who gave the order to stand down, and not go to the aid of our American citizens.

    2. I too want to know the answer to that question. I’ve yet to see anyone address that with the President, or Secretary of State or Petraeus.

    3. Not one of these people could give the order to send a rapid response team to help the Americans that were being brutalized and slaughtered, but they sure called out the rapid response team pretty fast to try to protect their own reputations.

      The only thing I believe at this point is that Petreaus had an affair, and that is because he wrote that himself in his resignation letter. The majority of the way the story rolled out, one drip at a time, over a period of days, was to take the focus off of what happened in Benghazi, and who was sitting at the main control panel as they were watching it in real time.

  2. Don’t be surprised if no one gave the order to stand down, they simply may have done nothing at all, except to go about doing more pressing matters than looking out for their folks.

    Remember guys like McCain and Graham were instrumental in cheering on the Administration to intervene in Libya in the first place, they helped create the situation in Benghazi and Libya. Now THEY want to assign blame for the murder of our fellow Americans.

    General Allen and the FBI Agent are stuck in Ray Donovan situation where do they go to get their reputations back.

Comments are closed.