Benghazi Is A Phony Scandal? Why The Polygraphs And Nondisclosure Agreements?

President Obama has taken to deriding those seeking answers about the murder of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other U.S. personnel in Benghazi last Sept. 11 as a “phony scandal.”

If there is nothing to this, then why are Benghazi survivors bound to keep silent by a nondisclosure agreement as Congressman Frank Wolf has brought to light?  Why are they, according to CNN, being subjected to monthly (if not more frequent) polygraph tests to find out if they are talking to either the media or people on Capitol Hill?  What were dozens of CIA operatives doing on the ground in Benghazi during the attack (other than for whatever reason not protecting / rescuing our ambassador)?

Something is phony here, but it isn’t the scandal.


3 thoughts on “Benghazi Is A Phony Scandal? Why The Polygraphs And Nondisclosure Agreements?

  1. Riley,

    Wolf is focusing on the wrong part of the ‘phony’ scandal. Congress needs to determine who made up and promoted the whopper about the video triggering the Benghazi events. Otherwise, it will degenerate into a phony outrage by a phony opposition, which at times appears to be all the GOP is capable and interested in doing.

  2. Bunch of effing idiots. What good are polygraphs, when you required them to be able to LIE ON A POLYGRAPH to get the job!?

Comments are closed.